Jump to content

bobdea

Gold Member
  • Posts

    6,991
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by bobdea

  1. What size? If they are 28-285 I’m all over it
  2. Yup, you are correct. Shock rebuilds shouldn’t be too bad. The electrical stuff on the one I re-wired started before anyone but the crew ran it, got worse as time went by.
  3. I don’t need the heels or the BTS, if they don’t move and you wanna break the family up I’ll take the shells...... im not making demands or anything, just if you run into difficulty moving the package let me know.
  4. All that said, also did some wrenching on a can am, some things were leaps and bounds better than Polaris others though were so ****ing annoying, like late 80s Volkswagen Jetta belts annoying I thought about taking a gas can and match to it to collect the insurance and get something else. We had one XP that couldn’t get wet, thought I’d found the issue spent hours re-wiring the thing and replacing a couple doo-dads, it got wet and did the same thing. To be fair, Polaris was great about it, sent us parts on their dime but it was more the man hours involved, sucked.
  5. Yeah! That was a big part of the “hate em’” had a fleet of them=endless wrenching. It was to the point where I had common parts stockpiled, Polaris reps phone # in my phone and ranger XP with a recovery trailer and bunch of field repair goodies.
  6. Lol, I’m happy on just about anything on two wheels. Yes, the newer RZRs are a little better. Still don’t like them, I like shifting. Would be happier on a sport quad even. All that said they certainly do handle well and have ample power. Also, on dunes they’re fine. Where I am it’s all relatively technical trail.
  7. A better product. It’s significantly stiffer. Not far off from a sidewinder but has the same f2 feel. I like the sigis a lot, having a hard time getting used to the canting.......
  8. The truth is I don’t think it makes much of the difference, as much as I like the bindings I’m very skeptical of the “skate tech” doing what they claim. The pressure comes from your boot pressing on the pad under the boot mostly....... those arms aren’t all that stiff, can torque them right off the board. That might be the secret to why the binding works so well allows more flex of the board under foot without being sloppy.
  9. Yeah, I feel you, I figured if they didn’t work they’d be easy to move here. The highback is bigger (wider, more wrap) than most so it’s fine for me with 21-10 angles. The no canting though, that hurts as I have grown to like softboot canting more and more.....
  10. Yeah! I really like them. Now that I have significant time on the Nows I’m missing some of the el hefes features but the Nows turn just a little bit better ugh, nothing is perfect.
  11. Ride is making them now, delamed, they are good about warranties though. Theres a reason no one does it! That said my Kessler hasn’t blown up yet.... look like it’s days are numbered though!
  12. bobdea

    FIS PGS/PSL Bias

    At the time that it was introduced a lot of people bitched about it. Maybe now they’re conditioned?
  13. bobdea

    FIS PGS/PSL Bias

    Yeah, so, parallel is a format that I hate. From day one, couldn’t stand it
  14. A lift might be the ticket, pretty much everything becomes a trade off. Flows have no heel cup but this becomes apparent when you feel the cable stretch. I don’t like them. They ride fine, just can’t like them. My favorite binding is the now O-Drive. Not very adjustable though. Super responsive without being harsh, no canting is the only thing that really bothers me about them. Ride el hefes are super nice, a little softer than the Nows. Little bit slimmer heel hoop but it’s negligible. Way more adjustable than the now bindings. drake Podiums are quite nice! Have an older set, the new ones have a bunch of improvements over my set so those are an option.
  15. -10 or -15f, were hard to get off my feet, burton boots.
  16. I say they have to take the dakotas and NH or no deal
  17. I dig that sweet return address stamp of yours....
  18. Did you try both sizes of f2s? Was it depth? Width? Anyone want to scan a set of cants so an SG cant can can be made on a on a 3D printer?
  19. What size f2 are they the same as? Large?
  20. Okay, so that’s solved.... next question.... what about the cants?
  21. I’m right there with you, they look to be the same as other f2 cants just no info on size... looks like there’s 3 f2 sizes?
×
×
  • Create New...