Jump to content
Note to New Members ×

Thirst Snowboard.. Purchase experience Excellent!!!


Shred Gruumer

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Jack M said:

I measured my K168.  Indeed the radius is longest around the waist.  In fact, there is about a 10cm span around the waist where the width of the board is a constant 202mm.  So the radius goes much longer (infinitely longer) than 12m in the center of the board.  The published 8-12 is merely an approximated representation.  All that said, 8-12m feels about right, and your statements above are consistent with my experience.  It is simply the most unique and effective sidecut I've ever tried.

Try a K168 and an MK first.

@AcousticBoarder above is good info. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, bigwavedave said:

Thirst sidecut likes to complete turns, just keep it on edge and/or apply more pressure to turn tighter.  Kessler has a race-course derived variable sidecut radius, so adds fore and aft rider weight distribution to the turning equation; get back on the tail=less turning, nose pressure=tighter turn.   

The K168 finishes turns bigtime.  It really is their magic freecarver.  It's my go-to board for ice or crowds.  By itself it's awesome.  Add a plate and it goes to 11.  I haven't ridden a pure SL 162, but the 168 is nothing at all like my 180, which definitely seems like it has a longer radius in the tail than the nose.

I believe the KST theory is that due to the tighter radii towards the ends of the board, and the decambered tip and tail, when you let the board run longer, you're not tilting it up as much and not engaging the tighter sidecut at the ends of the board.  This makes the board very easy and agreeable to coast and surf.  During aggressive carving you tilt the board up higher, and engage the ends of the board.  The tighter radii there bend the board, but the longer radius in the middle prevents the board from kinking, as single radius boards can do.  The clothoid shape of the sidecut, a.k.a. Euler spiral, is a continuous curve.  I feel this works significantly better than simply joining 2 or 3 radii together.  First run on mine last year I could feel that it was different and better than any sidecut I'd ridden before.  It's like it has the comfort of a long board with the turn size of a short board when you want it. I'm a believer.

http://www.kessler-swiss.com/en-US/technology/kesslerShapeTechnology

Sorry for the thread-jack Shred!  Thirst has certainly earned an impressive reputation in a relatively short amount of time.  Thanks for the details of the purchase experience, sounds great.  I'm glad we have another builder to choose from on this continent!

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/27/2019 at 8:50 AM, Jack M said:

The K168 finishes turns bigtime.  It really is their magic freecarver.  It's my go-to board for ice or crowds.  By itself it's awesome.  Add a plate and it goes to 11.  I haven't ridden a pure SL 162, but the 168 is nothing at all like my 180, which definitely seems like it has a longer radius in the tail than the nose.

Kessler should mention on his website that the 168 has a different sidecut geometry than all his other alpine race boards. My 180 & 162 definitely required extra input to complete turns or they would go off for the fall line and build up speed. Loved the ride, not the sidecut. Only had 2 runs on the 168 on frozen groom in flat light, so didn't get to fully explore it's potential, but that it felt very similar to my 175 Rev (11-12scr). I had assumed it had the same Kessler sidecut as all his other alpine boards. 

I believe the KST theory is that due to the tighter radii towards the ends of the board, and the decambered tip and tail, when you let the board run longer, you're not tilting it up as much and not engaging the tighter sidecut at the ends of the board.  This makes the board very easy and agreeable to coast and surf.  During aggressive carving you tilt the board up higher, and engage the ends of the board.  The tighter radii there bend the board, but the longer radius in the middle prevents the board from kinking, as single radius boards can do. First run on mine last year I could feel that it was different and better than any sidecut I'd ridden before.  It's like it has the comfort of a long board with the turn size of a short board when you want it. I'm a believer.

I don't know what sidecut geometry Mark uses in Thirst boards, but Crackaddict described it as being just the opposite of what you described above, ie, tight in the middle and straighter towards the ends:confused:Same result. My experience riding the Thirst boards is exactly as you describe in the above paragraph how your 168 feels and rides, including that it was apparent from the very first turns that this board's ride, and particularly the sidecut, was different and better than any I'd ridden before.

Sorry for the thread-jack Shred!  Thirst has certainly earned an impressive reputation in a relatively short amount of time.  Thanks for the details of the purchase experience, sounds great.  I'm glad we have another builder to choose from on this continent!

Thread Jack indeed!:ices_ange(pun intended). Jack, I hope you keep an open mind and give the "new-comer" board builder a chance and try one of his boards someday, even if you don't think you need one in your quiver. Knowing now that the 168 has a different sidecut geometry than other Kessler alpine race boards, I'll look forward to the opportunity to test drive one again, hopefully on better conditions.

And I'll also add, like @Shred Gruumer, I have no investment, nor am I compensated in any way by Thirst or any other builders, I also just like good boards. I've met Mark and he's a great guy, and humble I might add. I've been fortunate to meet and hang out with both Sean and Bruce at SES and have some favorite boards built by each of them (both called Rev btw). 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 8RW in murder black arrived this morning!  It is absolutely beautiful.  The finish on the thing is incredible. The finished  product is pretty much exactly what I expected.  It really stands apart from the other boards in my quiver.  Im going to attempt to go riding in the morning between shifts.  Will report back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like everyone else said, you just can't capture how damn shiny this thing is in photos.  There are a few slightly lighter snowflakes that don't show up in the pics either.  My first impression is this thing seems super stout.  I typically have issues with the upper exposed titanal layer on other boards getting bent up or chipping so I'm interested to see how this thing holds up to my particular brand of abuse.

IMG_2199.jpeg

IMG_2202.jpeg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was able to take it out this morning after working 13 hours overnight so neither my legs or brain were super fresh.  Initial impressions are super positive.  I'm going to take it for a more serious ride on Thursday so I'm going to wait until then to share my full thoughts in the review section.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/31/2019 at 2:59 AM, Carvin' Marvin said:

Like everyone else said, you just can't capture how damn shiny this thing is in photos.  There are a few slightly lighter snowflakes that don't show up in the pics either.  My first impression is this thing seems super stout.  I typically have issues with the upper exposed titanal layer on other boards getting bent up or chipping so I'm interested to see how this thing holds up to my particular brand of abuse.

Looks nice!   What sort of topsheet material is used?  Is that a graphic print on plastic top?  It almost has a textured look to it.

When you refer to bent up and chipping metal is that from lift chair dings?    

Edited by Gabe T
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a bit of discussion regarding the topsheet material in the above thread. Kessler has been using it too.

3 hours ago, Gabe T said:

Looks nice!   What sort of toosheet material is used on the top?  Is that a graphic print on plastic top?  It almost has a textured look to it.

When you refer to bent up and chipping metal is that from lift chair dings?    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Gabe T said:

When you refer to bent up and chipping metal is that from lift chair dings?    

Chairlift dings and trees/anything wood are what gets me most.  I find that wood slivers really like to get under that top titanal layer causing it to wrinkle a bit then if it gets hit again it chips.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Carvin' Marvin said:

Chairlift dings and trees/anything wood are what gets me most.  I find that wood slivers really like to get under that top titanal layer causing it to wrinkle a bit then if it gets hit again it chips.  

You mainly freeride?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The kessler website says Clothoid, but according to the image in the link below the center is constant and the tip and tail deviate.

http://www.kessler-swiss.com/en-US/technology/kesslerShapeTechnology

My guess would be that the image is an engineering approximation of the clothoid curve that the difference is negligible for practical purposes. If somebody feels the urge to do the math.....

edit: I noticed that I did not read up to the end of the thread when I posted this.....

Edited by TimW
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TimW said:

The kessler website says Clothoid, but according to the image in the link below the center is constant and the tip and tail deviate.

@TimW If you were to interpolate (in a specific way, not linearly) between those radii, it is a clothoid spiral or more technically an Euler spiral (pronounced "Oiler"). Of course, it isn't an entire Euler spiral, just part of one. So the geometry is actually comprised of 4 'parts' of an euler spiral (or possibly combined spirals of differing variables) to create the front and rear.

I think it is possible two or more things are happening here, either 1 formula and inverted twice on both axis and set about a setback point or 2 formula each inverted about the longitudinal axis of the board to create different front and rear effect from weighting. Or possibly, multiple spirals are joined together and then inverted if a single spiral can not be defined to create the desired properties.

I think the diagram is just a nice way of showing people who aren't really interested in the math behind an Euler spiral, roughly how it is devised, that is, it gets smaller and smaller to the tip and at the 'mid point' of the board, it is very large, approaches infinity from both ends. 

Edited by daveo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, boardguru said:

Carvin' Marvin, in your picture it looks as if you are putting a custom 'stone grind' on you new Thirst board.

Lol. I wouldn't dare.  Old pic on my short proteus.  I think the thirst would gain lift and paraglide away.  I just posted it because I have some deep-seated psychological need to show you guys how awesome I think I am.  Probably something to do with Freud.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carvin' Marvin said:

I have some deep-seated psychological need to show you guys how awesome I think I am

C’mon Aaron. Bar far the funnest guy to follow(try to follow) on the mountain on any given day. Larger than normal carving bubble for your sake not his😉🤙🏼

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never tried a K168, but have Thirst 8RW and Superconductor.  From what is described for the K168 sidecut, I think they take a  different approach to variable sidecut.  They differ from radial in very different ways.

I'm a bit surprised that a 8-12-8(?) VSR could hold longer turns well on ice.  Snappy initiation, yes, but concentrating the edge pressure at the tip and tail when the board isn't forming a trench would, I think, leave the center carrying too little load, supported by the board's center stiffness instead of the snow.  With the turning forces concentrated at the ends of the tip and tail, eventually their hold risks being overwhelmed.

Thirst flex/sidecut seems to be designed to keep edge bite underfoot.  Slower initiation, but then like you're riding an ice skate between the bindings.  I think that's what leads to the stay-centered riding style -- no need to chase the bite elsewhere, feels funny if you do.

So both fun, but I suspect very different rides.  Buy both.  $$$

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, b0ardski said:

so if I bought a kessler and said it was great, would you guys be arguing about thirsts?

lol... we been here long enough to know that is a resounding yes.
As the weather gets warmer; we will start to argue about everything... the sky is too blue; change my mind 😁

I think it's a great compliment to Mark and Thirst or any board maker.  In a sense BMW M care is the yard stick and seems Kessler 168 is the same for Alpine snowboard.
Recalled not long ago; information on Thirst Snowboard was being suppress.  Change is unavoidable and sometime good 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/9/2019 at 9:05 AM, johnasmo said:

 

Thirst flex/sidecut seems to be designed to keep edge bite underfoot.  Slower initiation, 

this is so far the most important information for me I found about Thirst boards. I talk to Mark a couple times he seams to be really nice guy. My concern was the almost all reviews were written hard core Coilers rider. And you just love these boards or not. After surgery on my foot several years ago I can’t put pretty much any pressure on the tip of my front foot so my toe side turns really suffer. And I did not master Jorg’s Style of riding. This was main reason to get Kessler 62 which should have a starting radius of 7m. Well it did not work I just don’t like that side cut shape. So without trying Thirst on the snow I am not willing just blindly buy another board. But where to try it? It was the best thing on SES ability to check different boards. So my last two custom boards built by Frank still work the best. I also liked MK a couple years ago but probably would like it a little bit wider for shallower angles.Maybe just simple  side cut working the best for me. What is MK around 9m?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thirst had a whole demo fleet at 2019 Montucky Clear CUT.  I imagine Thirst will again in 2020. As well as other manufacturers.. had Coiler, Exlgi, Ace Skwal, and Alloy at the 2019 session.  I expect more builders for 2020 demos at the MCC.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know but not everyone has time to get in the middle of nowhere. I was checking this winter and it was pretty much nightmare Wasting two days on travel something I can’t afford in current job. If this will be future carvers meeting place it will not make this sport more popular for sure. Close event in probably in one of the most remote resort in America.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Continuing talking about anything but the thread title...

38 minutes ago, Ladia said:

If this will be future carvers meeting place it will not make this sport more popular for sure.

Simple solution: Just spend hundreds of hours to organize your own event for your friends.  😉

How many people started hardbooting/alpine riding after seeing it at the Aspen sessions?  I'd be surprised if it was more than 5.  

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...