Got a pair of these, phantom ski, a little searching and found an old non working link to www.phantomski.com from 2003, age of link fr which folk were talking about this new ski design, they pair went for $850. It is cap construction. There is a ton of glass in the base, approx. 0.070" thickness and has tan rubber. One ski alone is very stiff even as skwalls go for flex. Usually skis are quite soft compared to a skwall. So I am not sure if ridden as a skwall if it would be too stiff. The dims are 160 cm length, 100 mm waist, 185 mm tip, 160 mm tail. .575"=14.6mm thick at waist. But the glass amount makes this ski very stiff, even difficult to flex. 1410 mm effective edge and a 38 mm base height gives SCR of 6.56 meters. So something that tight may not even be able to be ridden , the cuts might be too tight. Has any skwall or alpine board been ever made with such a small SCR? I will give it a try, seeing that the initial investment cost was very low. And already have a set of TD1 skwall bindings. The last ski project I tried did not have enough SCR, this may have too much. Might just screw the td1 in from the top.
Forgot to mention, It has very nice carving tip decamber ofapprox. 3 inches, and also a very nice tail decamber approx. 1.5 inches, for some thing made in 2003 or earlier, this ski designer knew how to shape a carving ski, although in his write up , he is calling it a powder ski. Decamber is quite aggressive, so it should be fun to try. Any guesses on how it will carve? Too tight so it will wash out at end of carve?? Or so tight, rider must hold tight as possible and keep down hill speed minimized? December is coming,