Jump to content
Note to New Members ×

Softboot carvers: mainstream vs custom


Neil Gendzwill

Recommended Posts

Not sure if anyone has a lot of comparison experience but what is the general opinion on custom decks from our favourite suppliers vs carving focused boards from the mainstream? It seems like the big companies have access to a lot of tech the little guys don’t. Is one of Bruce’s or Sean’s boards going to outperform something from Capita or Jones? Or maybe the mid sized companies like Korua or Amplid are making stuff we’d like?

To be clear I’m talking about softboot decks with either a pure carving focus like the Jones Freecarver or more general purpose ones that are thought to be good carvers like the Capita Megadeath. TBH the Megadeath looks pretty damn cool with the super lightweight carbon construction and Fawcett had some pretty glowing comments on YouTube. OTOH thinking of getting a Contra before Bruce hangs it up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only carver among those I would even consider is the 164 Jones 9000 with a 9.6m sidecut.

I ride both setups (hard/soft) quite a bit, it seems for any given sidecut radius, trying to go for the "same" turn is like riding hardboots 2m, maybe 3m bigger.

I don't want an SL-ish sidecut on a softboot board, so I want the hardboot equivalent of 12m+.

It seems 10m sidecuts are "huge" and are for the "expert" riders only.

Edited by Odd Job
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

chapter 1: yep

chapter 2: what is wide?

chapter 3: directional vs. twin (shape, construction, scr, etc.)

chapter 4: riding conditions/environment and intent of use

chapter 5: rider skills and preferences

chapter 6: exclusive or mainstream

chapter 7: marketing and sales

chapter 8: manufacturer's and builders

chapter 9: alterations (plates and other equipment)

not necessarily in that order, but these are some of the considerations when comparing what is suggested and there can be a bit of a grey area when it comes to both mainstream and custom. each builder/manufacturer knows what's best for you and you'd probably get different boards from each one if you told them all the same thing. none are wrong when compared to mainstream boards though. worth every penny. however, mainstream boards work just fine and there are some that may be better than others. most of these factors depend on the rider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good question.

I've been riding "soft boot" boards for years, just because I found hard boot boards were not to my personal liking in powder. Those old GS style boards are like planks in deep snow; you can ride them, but they feel unresponsive to me. I didn't ride powder boards on piste though, because my Kessler SL was significantly better at that.

Burton's Dump truck was maybe first more modern (short) powder board I tried on piste. I heard it was supposed to be good at that, but ... I concluded that it was too wide for me. I found it hard to get on edge with my negative boot-out.

Then I mellowed out my stance because someone here suggested it, and at 40°/30° I found the Hometown Hero fit my boots pretty well. It just blew me away on piste. That wasn't what I expected. I've rarely been that surprised. I retired my Kessler immediately, and just switched to the HH for everything. It'll carve circles indoors, or rip closed piste with Fawcett at Mach 2. 

I love the 6.6m radius; I can ride closed piste as fast as I like, and still carve circles indoors, all on the same board. I don't actually think these are particularly novice friendly; novices tend to try them and swap for something a bit bigger, in my experience. I doubt anyone here is a novice though.


I think the jury's out, and it depends what people want. I would look at the board width and what angles they're going to work with, then rent some and see. But overall this has to be a good thing for those who like to turn on the edge, irrespective.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, for serious carving, I won’t be getting anything less than microbrew builds like the “kitchen sink” construction from Winterstick going forward.  I think constructions like these don’t make sense for mass market boards. That said, the Ride Commissioner is pretty exotic, but it’s not a carving focused shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Jack M said:

Personally, for serious carving, I won’t be getting anything less than microbrew builds like the “kitchen sink” construction from Winterstick going forward.  I think constructions like these don’t make sense for mass market boards. That said, the Ride Commissioner is pretty exotic, but it’s not a carving focused shape.

Amplid is doing some pretty complicated stuff with their Centrifugal line. I thought the Commissioner was Ride’s carver, it’s essentially the new Timeless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Small sidecut radii on most production boards I think are terrible. My opinion... as most are sub 10m. Why not go custom or at least find the sweet niche boards like Rad-Air to ride? I do love my Alloy boards and will have a couple new boards here in the next week that I will post in the New Board Porn thread. I think Custom is the way to go as most of us have done this for a long time and work hard enough to enjoy boutique/custom rides. For me, I really have found my sweet spot (for now) with high end production boards. The AZX I ride from alloy is a 163 with a 26 waist and a 14.6m radius and the DO Model i have ridden for several seasons (with small tweaks each season) Is a 165 with an average radius of 12.5 m at 26 waist. This season I am down-sizing to a 161/ we will see. Might have to grab last seasons 165. This is  what pushes me to the opinion thta custom is where its at. My new AZX is going to become my new go to this year. 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've owned tons of production softboot carvers and really the vast majority of them just aren't on par with a custom board. Currently my main softboot carver is a coiler contra. It is noticeably more stable and damp than any production board. but also a lot heftier. 27cm waist, 165 length, and 12m sidecut. If all you want to do is carve, i would 100% say getting a custom board like a coiler is worth it. But its definitely less versatile of a board than a production board.

That being said there really are some gems out there. Korua shapes bullet-train is an absolutely phenomenal carver. I'd put it up there with the best of them. Nidecker blade, amplid pentaquark are a couple others. these are all boards i'd be incredibly happy to own and daily drive. They carve incredibly well and are a blast to ride, and you don't feel restricted from hitting the occasional sidehit and goofing around. I think the biggest drawback with most production boards labeled as carving boards is the smaller sidecut radius. The korua bullet train is the best i've gotten to experience at 9.8m.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My go to every day ride is the Amplid Pentaquark 160 model.  It can do it all.   The Amplid Surfari has my interest and has gotten great reviews but there are few in north america to demo...

If I know it will be corduroy all day I go with the Endeavor Hammer Head 163.  I wish I could find the smaller version for smaller hills and busy days.

Snow Soon....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I looked at the Pentaquark last year and leaving their questionable “designed only for the real men” macho marketing aside, I think it had like a 260 waist with an 8.5 sidecut.

Those numbers may not be ideal for all riders; and it’s designed for all types of riding, not carving-specific. The big benefit of custom is to be able to tweak those numbers to fit your preference. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ShortcutToMoncton said:

I looked at the Pentaquark last year and leaving their questionable “designed only for the real men” macho marketing aside, I think it had like a 260 waist with an 8.5 sidecut.

Those numbers may not be ideal for all riders; and it’s designed for all types of riding, not carving-specific. The big benefit of custom is to be able to tweak those numbers to fit your preference. 

 


The company (Amplid) call traditional camber “[b]urly man-camber”…

 

IMG_8553.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/12/2023 at 10:15 PM, Jack M said:

Personally, for serious carving, I won’t be getting anything less than microbrew builds like the “kitchen sink” construction from Winterstick going forward.  I think constructions like these don’t make sense for mass market boards. That said, the Ride Commissioner is pretty exotic, but it’s not a carving focused shape.

The commissioner is too narrow! The first couple years when it was the reintroduced timeless was as close to a BXFR as you’re gonna get… replaced mine with a BXFR and I’m happier for it.. 

wescott pro in kitchen sink trim? That might be something….. 

Stay tuned on that one, and, I did just sell my tanker 177…. Maybe it will be the “roundtail plus” 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...