JohnE Posted March 14 Report Share Posted March 14 Do you think the sport of carving is evolving toward hardboots or soft? I tried for many years to carve well in hardboots but just never got comfortable with the high angles. I would head to the mountains with 2 sets of gear (soft & hard depending on conditions). A real pain to haul the gear and question what was the right tool for the job that day. I then gave softboot carving a try and found it much more natural for me. Now I head to the mountains with only one setup. However, in my opinion, the best carvers I see are hardbooters. But, as the years pass, do you think there will be more softboot carvers or hardboot? Have you personally evolved toward one or the other? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Gendzwill Posted March 14 Report Share Posted March 14 Hardboot carving is dying and has been for years. I think the current popularity of softboot carving is not going to create any great movement towards hardboots. Rather, the opposite. As the soft gear gets better fewer people will find a reason to seek out hard gear. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corey Posted March 14 Report Share Posted March 14 There are probably more softboot carvers than hardbooters right now. There are more people that watch fishing videos on YouTube too, so maybe all of snowboarding is dying? The success of hardbooting is not threatened by the success of softboot carving. So I say cool, pick the equipment you want! 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
softbootsurfer Posted March 14 Report Share Posted March 14 There will be no HB in 9.79 years… the collapse of support for Alpine racing will bring that about, excluding Beer Leagues, lack of sales will bring about a major decline in Alpine Boards being produced 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd Job Posted March 19 Report Share Posted March 19 I wish I could pick. My wallet hates that I swing both ways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuxdiesel Posted March 19 Report Share Posted March 19 For me at nearly 60 and with limited time to ride these days, a great soft boot carver is my choice. If the snow conditions aren't just right, I can no longer ride my hard boot set-ups very well. 25-30 years ago it wasn't a problem. The lines I make on the groom now with a BXFR are the same as the old days, and if the trails get icy, sloppy or lumpy I can manage to ride without beating myself up. There is a wow factor to seeing a great hard boot rider tear it up, but I'm happy with the sensations I get nowadays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philw Posted March 19 Report Share Posted March 19 I think the number of people carving, or wanting to carve, is larger than it was. That's an unalloyed good. I look forward to a time when I can once again admit to being a snowboarder, and people won't assume I'm a side slipper numpty who will slow them down. Yay. Bring it on. Those additional numbers have to come from the general snowboarding population - people currently using soft boots. People often tell me they're surprised that I can ride well in powder, what with my hard boots and all. I just laugh, because it's not about the boots. Turn that around the other way, and I'm not remotely surprised that soft booters are able to carve well in their chosen footwear. => It's not about the boots. My understanding is that soft boot setups can be harder than my own boots. It's still not about the boots. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnE Posted March 20 Author Report Share Posted March 20 I think it is more about the width of the board and the boot angles that requires. Has anyone tried a board with a waist of 26 - 30 cm with hardboots at low angles? What would be the advantages / disadvantages of that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhamann Posted March 20 Report Share Posted March 20 (edited) tried it @JohnE and i'm sure others have as well. i think you know the answer. just standing in place told my body that the skeletal structure isn't going to like this. i wanted to like it and was fun for a few laps, but the reality of this test concluded that i will just pick one. the two sports/disciplines are not intended to be combined, aside from abnormal circumstances. i don't believe the equipment is designed or meant to take on the forces for such an idea and my body let me know this when i was in my late 30's. way too many adjustments, tweaks, etc. then again, some folks prefer to ride duck in hardboots. Edited March 20 by dhamann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd Job Posted March 20 Report Share Posted March 20 (edited) If your technique is somewhat on, there is almost no difference between the two. I still have separate softboot boards for freeriding. I don't want to hit rocks with some of my softboot carvers. Edited March 20 by Odd Job 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnE Posted March 24 Author Report Share Posted March 24 I may have found the answer to my question of boot type -vs- angles. My riding buddy has 2 Donek Fluxes - the main difference being the waist width. Wide board with softboots & bindings. Narrower board with Deeluxe hybrid (discontinued) boots and F2 Intech bindings. (I forget what these boots were called. )Lower boot section is rigid like a hardboot. Uppers are soft like a soft boot. Angles on the boards are the same. I asked him if he can tell much of a difference between the 2 setups. He says no. Except that the Intechs are easier in & out. When I watch him ride, I can't tell the difference. So this tells me that the main difference is the steep angles required by a narrow board and not the boot type. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philw Posted March 25 Report Share Posted March 25 I think that's correct. Which begs the question... why are many "alpine" boards quite so narrow? When I started (1989) Alpine boards were Asymmetrical, looking weird compared with ordinary general purpose snowboards. I don't particularly recall thinking they were particularly narrow though. Stances were not, in the late 1980s. Over time, my powder boards got fatter, and my piste boards got narrower. Then mainstream powder board design changed with taper, shorter designs and better tail shapes. My piste board got shorter too, with Titanal. I ended up with a Kessler with a 19cm waist and my Hometown Hero with a 24cm waist... The Kessler would win races, but for general use, I don't feel I'm giving anything at all up for that extra width... and it lets me use a lower angled stance. Kind of like the early stances, except there's no Craig "knee tuck" these days and no asymmetry, thankfully 18 hours ago, JohnE said: When I watch him ride, I can't tell the difference. So this tells me that the main difference is the steep angles required by a narrow board and not the boot type. When I watch my [soft boot] buddies ride, I can't tell the difference, from a distance. I've ridden soft boot boards with my hard boots since I discovered that soft boot boards work better in deep snow than race boards. I don't think it's the boots, but I guess I do think it's the board 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philw Posted March 25 Report Share Posted March 25 And as I was discussing this with someone else just now for other reasons... one aspect of evolution is happening remarkably quickly, which is the change back from duck to forward stances in the general population. Most pre-Covid stuff I googled seems very ducky. It's almost like there was only one way to ride in 2017 : duck. Today though, both Koura and Jones snowboard websites are strongly pushing forward angles. It's a different world all of a sudden. Koura's Wolken's internet trail shows his stance getting narrower and steeper rapidly: in 2017 he was 52cm 21/6, in 2023 he's 49cm 27/15. I'm not quite suggesting evolution in stiffness of boots, but something major is/ has happened in stance geometry in the last few years. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.