The Madd Killer strikes back! Was able to do back to back runs comparing a few boards that I personally love for carving. The original Madd 158, Oxess 161, and two prototypes of the Donek Madd Killer 161. Anyone who knows me well, knows how fond I am of the original Madd 158. I’ve logged more days on these boards than I can count—owned 5 originals. This board had my highest ratings for aggressive carving until..the Madd Killer had surfaced.
Before we get to talking about the Madd Killer, the Oxess 161 has a fun factor right up next to the Madd 158. Its edge hold is well above average, quick transitions and performs aggressively if given the load. I’m not too happy with the rusted inserts on the Oxess as that made the binding change over a little time consuming. The key with the Oxess is having Marcel make one that has the perfect blend of dampness and pop for your primary riding surface. The first Oxess 161 that he had sent was super lively and had tons of pop but did not fare well on skied off ice conditions. I had him construct the same thing but making it more damp—presto!-- the proper mix was found. Comparing it to the original Madd 158, I’d take the Madd any day over the Oxess as it is more nimble and has better edge hold.
Bring on the Donek Madd Killer 161. This board, in its current state, is clearly the winner. While more positive changes are still in the works, I had to come to terms that this board outperforms the original Madd 158. I really never thought that would happen. Its edge hold is beyond crazy, transitions are not just quick but lightning quick, tracks well at speed and will handle any aggressive load put into it.
I’m not going to mention any specs other than the lengths. I didn’t want to know for purpose of the testing. The main goal was to ride each and see which would deliver. Catek bindings were used, no plate and I would highly suggest you leave the plate at home. No metal boards here.
Donek Madd Killer Original Madd 158
Oxess 161