skategoat Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 It's: "heels" not "heals" "brakes" not "breaks" "too" not "to" Thank you for your time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big mario Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 Thank you mario Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tex1230 Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 "waist" not "waste", "Waiste", or however the hell else you're trying to spell it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derf Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 Sight: view Site: location Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Gendzwill Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 Your - possessive You're - contraction of you are Snowboards - plural of snowboard Snowboard's - contraction of snowboard is Could care less - means you care at least a little but you probably meant to say: Couldn't care less - the least possible amount of caring for something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack M Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 "you're" not "your" for you are. My son's Kindergarten teacher made this mistake in the first paragraph of her first letter of the year to parents. Ahh, socialized education. edit - DOH, Neil beat me to it. But Neil, I disagree - "could care less" has no meaning and no appropriate use. Much like irregardless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willywhit Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 Diss, not Dish http://www.247wallst.com/2007/03/fama_and_french.html to, too and two as in... he has to much dirt on me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pebu Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 Your - possessiveYou're - contraction of you are Snowboards - plural of snowboard Snowboard's - contraction of snowboard is Also, I would venture to say that "snowboard's" could be a possessive, for example, "snowboard's topsheet" meaning the topsheet that the snowboard has. Could care less - means you care at least a little but you probably meant to say:Couldn't care less - the least possible amount of caring for something That one is really really annoying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dingbat Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 How exactly do you "much dirt" on someone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roscoe Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 to, too and two as in... he has to much dirt on me but it would be .... he has TOO much dirt on me, he knew i went TO the store, TO buy TWO, which was TWO, TOO many. it turns out, he went there TOO. k im done Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C5 Golfer Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 ". Much like irregardless. kinda like inflammable - its Flammable. Also, never use a preposition to end a sentence with! [sic] stupidest is not a word unless of course it used in sentence about skiing or a baseball cap worn bassakwards! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willywhit Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 but it would be .... he has TOO much dirt on me, he knew i went TO the store, TO buy TWO, which was TWO, TOO many. it turns out, he went there TOO. k im done I was quoting from another thread and for all intensive purposes........ You know what they say: People in glass houses sink sh... sh... sh... ships. Never kick a gift mule in the face. If you can't stand the heat, turn off the oven. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack M Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 and for all intensive purposes........ lol - it's "for all intents and purposes". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willywhit Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 People in glass houses sink sh... sh... sh... ships. random, I know. great scene from Boondock Saints (another great boston film) Doc: You know what they say: People in glass houses sink sh... sh... sh... ships. Rocco: I got to buy you a proverb book or something, because this mix 'n' match ****'s got to go. Doc: What? Connor: Well, a penny saved is worth two in the bush, isn't it? Murphy: And don't cross the road if you can't get out of the kitchen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Gendzwill Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 "literally" is not an adjective to add emphasis - it means what you are saying, which is usually a metaphor, actually happened in the literal sense. "She was literally torn in half by her decision" means that her body was in two pieces, meaning she's dead, Jim. You meant to say "she was figuratively torn in half", or just "she was torn in half" and we all infer the metaphor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yyzcanuck Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 kinda like inflammable - its Flammable. No, it's both inflammable and flammable! And... it's not its, it's it's! Or is it? Hell I don't know! I also just noticed Willy's "Escape Goat"... now that's funny! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Prokopiw Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 I like "could care less".It implies that I almost don't give a damn, but I still hope,against all odds, that I will continue to care at least a little. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Gendzwill Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 I wouldn't mind if people who used "could care less" understood the grammar well enough to use it in that context. Sadly, they just have it wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C5 Golfer Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 No, it's both inflammable and flammable! ! Nope! Is it not kinda like saying " I don't know nothing" which equates to multiplying a negative number by a negative number and getting a positive which in the quote says you know something. Or should l I just ask you "do you know of any substance that is inflammable that is not flammable?" I know you could prolly really care less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willywhit Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 "Our company is multi-fauceted." I'm serial! "Oh, well, when in Rome." Ron: "Yes? Please go on." http://www.moviewavs.com/php/sounds/?id=bst&media=WAVS&type=Movies&movie=Anchorman_The_Legend_Of_Ron_Burgundy"e=wheninrome.txt&file=wheninrome.wav Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tex1230 Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 Cereal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pebu Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 The president of this company is famous for mixing and matching phrases. Stuff like, "that's gonna blow up like a Christmas tree," and "we'll burn that bridge when we get to it." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack M Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 I like "could care less".It implies that I almost don't give a damn, but I still hope,against all odds, that I will continue to care at least a little. ahh, nope. your still wrong. :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MUD Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 The president of this company is famous for mixing and matching phrases. Stuff like, "that's gonna blow up like a Christmas tree," and "we'll burn that bridge when we get to it." I think they must teach that in a seminar or something... I have had two superiors that have done that. The first time it was funny, the second it was an eye roller. This was at to different companies (sorry, couldn't resist). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willywhit Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 Last edited by trailertrash : 31 Minutes Ago at 06:47 PM. Reason: spelling... spelling ? you're responsible for your own spelling, aren't you ? the grammar police ! run away ! :lol: are you Cereal? kinda funny listening to my wife trying to say "literally" or "seriously" esp when she's heated :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.