Although I was not the culprit in question, I can't help feeling like I was being addressed indirectly here.
Speaking for myself, the way the Philosophy and Technique sections of extremecarving.com speak in rigid, absolute terms and take a fundamentalist tone turns me off. It says things like this is correct, and that is incorrect. This is fun, that is unfun. You must set up your bindings like this and not like that. One irony is that the Rotation page is in direct contradiction to the Gesture Purity page - rotation is not necessary, and imo, wasted motion. Notice I said "not necessary", not "incorrect". You can rotate to your heart's content if you like it.
Also, as someone who was promoting the advancement of alpine technique in the mid and late nineties, I take offense to the "alpine killed alpine" manifesto, and I sincerely believe it is wholly false.
I have never met any of you, but I hope to someday. You seem like good guys overall, and I admire your carving style for what it is. I'd love to see it up close, and especially here on the ice-coast. Your efforts to get more people into alpine are to be congratulated. But when you present yourselves like this, and you tell other expert carvers that what they're doing is incorrect, you open yourself up to this kind of response.
I'll admit there was a time when I took a more black and white approach to technique, but I have moved on from there. I wish you guys would too. After all, we're all on the same team.
Cheers,
-Jack