Jump to content
Note to New Members ×

F2 T Nuts


slapos

Recommended Posts

hi all,

i keep cracking my t nuts in F2 Race bindings which has become quite annoying.

does anyone have a DIN number of a similar product to use instead of original F2s?

I could potentially CNC them out of inox or any other material - any recommendations on what material would work best for these?

Inox or brass maybe?

kindly asking for you inputs

thanks

Lukasz

Edited by slapos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

316 stainless is what I changed out in my UPZ boots to secure Intec heels for strength & corrosion resistance.

"Stainless steel 316 grade is highly used for high-temperature applications. This grade has high strength as it includes high nickel chemical composition. The grade consists of a minimum of 10% nickel content, whereas 18/8 (304) consists of only 8% of nickel content. 316 is stronger and more durable than 304."

https://www.mcmaster.com/tee-nuts/316-stainless-steel-tee-nut-inserts-for-wood/

If you also change out the phillip head screws to hex head, be careful not to over torque.  Not a bad idea to use a loc-tite type product or teflon tape on the threads to help secure.

 

Edited by Pat Donnelly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I used to ride F2s I considered these a consumable part and just replaced the whole set every year, and always had a set of spares for any mid-season issues; would give them a quick check every 20 days or so. 

Have you considered switching over to SG bindings instead of machining your own small parts? Nothing on my SGs has needed replacing since I switched to them 3-4 years ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sg bindings currently cost more then twice the price of F2s. For me its not enough evolution in SG bindings to spend that much on plastic/nylon binding. I did own them in the past but sold them.

looking at mcmaster carr site i found these two that would possibly fit:

https://www.mcmaster.com/90563A640/

https://www.mcmaster.com/90594A370/

anybody can provide inputs if the material of these two would be right to use for this application?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that’s part of the F2 life we live. I personally wouldn’t go hunting for alternatives. They are already made of high quality stainless and shaped exactly for the binding. They are disposable and should be treated as such and replaced.  Have replacements available and check frequently. I bet I could extrude a brass one through the baseplate like a noodle. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we know that the F2 tnuts aren’t 316?  They are definitely ss, but it is thin material in a very high stress area.  Helicoils might have been a better design solution, but oh well.  I definitely vote for PZ head screws instead of hex.  The only ss hex-head screws that I’ve found for use with the bindings stripped the hex so easily. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did order similar weld nuts once, but they are more flimsy than the original F2 nuts. 

One issue with the T-nuts is that they are loaded at an angle if you place a lift or cant shim. Because of this they will only carry load on one side and deform.  Make sure that you do not untighten them and then re-mount/tighten them in a different orientation. Then they will deform to the new orientation each time. Repeated plastic deformation makes cracking more likely. 

When I installed them, I 'over-tightened' them so that they deform and are properly seated, and then backed off a tiny bit. This makes sure that at least they carry load around their full circumference. I make sure when I check them that I re-install them in the same orientation so they are still properly seated. 

Make sure to have them tightened properly. Bolt preload is key in preventing fatigue failure. Insufficient torque increases the likelihood of failure. 

 

I have considering buying these :https://www.rvspaleis.nl/moeren/hulsmoeren/plattekop-open. They are more solid, but because they are stiffer I think the alignment issue may actually make them worse. Something that allows a bit of alignment would probably be better, e.g. something like this https://www.rvspaleis.nl/moeren/hulsmoeren/verzonken-binnenzeskant  , but the countersunk ridge looks a bit small. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...