Jump to content
Note to New Members ×

Photoshopped pic


johnstewart

Recommended Posts

My first attempt at stitching an image together.

I've got another one I'm working on that is 8 or so pics of an entire race course. The photographer is awesome. Problem I've not sorted out there is how to get the levels set equally across the pictures so there is no seam.

With this one, there wasn't much difference in brightness/hue/saturation, etc... only the leftmost image was slightly off.

Anyone know a good way to get Photoshop to even out the levels between images?

post-12-141842200776_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Frappe

Photoshop has an autolevel feature, in Image -> Adjustments.

I don't use it a lot, but that may help? that looks pretty good for a first try

Well, that would seem to adjust the levels for that particular image (or layer, perhaps), but the problem is that it will pick different selections for different images. I need to find some way to point to a particular pixel and tell it to make that the same color in both layers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, here's the big one.

The original on this is HUGE... 7995x6331!

I'm going to see what I can find out about getting this printed out in a large format.

The photographer used a Canon D10, I think... it's a high end digital SLR, and the guy had some seriously good glass to go with it!

My photoshopping leaves a little to be desired, but it came out well.

Looking at it on a monitor just doesn't give enough resolution to appreciate the detail.

It's too bad the forum only allows a width up to 600...

post-12-141842200779_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That first pic set is great. Just wondering why you're 10 feet outside the gate. :D

After lookin at the time-lapse set for the entire course I got another idea for your toe-sides. Drop me a liner and I'll reply later. Sweet sets though...we gotta get him to come out for a MOnday night or Sunday afternoon race sometime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by $trider

That first pic set is great. Just wondering why you're 10 feet outside the gate. :D

Yeah.... dunno... it does look that way; it didn't feel that way.

I do know I was getting way early on thost first few gates, which gave me a nice line for the rest of the course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job on the photosequences. Hope to see more as you develop your skills!

I think the first image works a bit better to show a flow of movement. To my eye, the second is a bit too spaced-out to really capture the rider's movement through the course.

For additional ideas as to how to compose your image (as well as get inspiriation from seeing some of the world's best skiers on-course doing what they do best), you might want to check out Ron LeMaster's website. It's great stuff!

I highly recommend Ron's book The Skier's Edge. It is, IMO, the best book out there that explains, in simple language, how skiing (or, by extrapolation, snowboarding) works. Great images as well!

Check it out. You'll be glad you did!

<img src="http://tinypic.com/1j3qpu">

Hope it's snowing where you are!

Cheers,

B-2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by boostertwo

Good job on the photosequences. Hope to see more as you develop your skills!

I think the first image works a bit better to show a flow of movement. To my eye, the second is a bit too spaced-out to really capture the rider's movement through the course.

Just FYI... I was the rider (and photoshopper), *not* the photographer. And it *was* a gold-medal run:

http://www.nastar.com/index.jsp?pagename=raceresults&race=38430&year=2005

And I like the big one - it's such high-res, I can print this out in REALLY large format and still get great detail. I'm gonna try that tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by patmoore

It isn't often that the pacesetter gets beat by someone on a board. Way to go!

Thanks. =)

I was razzing the pacesetter, who was also running the NASTAR course that day, about that. He said he was gonna have his 18 year old daughter run the pace the next day, so I would have more of a challenge.

However, I never had a chance... the next morning I took an unplanned trip off-piste at mach 10, and had the worst crash in my life. Blood everywhere and lucky the rock in my back didn't bruse my kidney (had it been 4 inches to the right it would have hit my spine and I doubt I'd be walking now). Just stopped taking the Vicodin last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best simple panorama tool I've seen to date:

http://www.autostitch.net/

Unforetunately, it's merging system isn't aware of what we want for multi-exposure action sequences, so moving objects end up ghosted.

But it might be useful for you guys to just put together a quick sequence in a couple seconds, and it spits out a text file of the tramsform parameters for each image. Any geeks on here wanna write a quick app to parse that and do a smarter segmentation? I'll put it on the neverending list of projects I'll likely not get around to ;).

And of course if you just want the glamor landscape shot, this thing is extremely easy (though slightly lower quality than photoshop by hand).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an example. I think with a little tweaking on the merge settings the 'halos' could go away. But not the ghosting of moving objects.

Definately not nearly as good as the totally by hand method, but it's instant, and might be useful as a guide image to by hand warping.

Rider Credit: Kenny T.

Photo Credit: Bryan of www.oldsnowboards.com

post-7-141842202436_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by mirror70

What camera are you using? Many P&S cameras have ways to lock the exposure.

That actually does not help much if you know how CCD sensor works.

You will lock exposure and overexpose scenes in bright light. It will work like looking directly into sun.

Even a human eyes adjusts "exposure" although it has peripheral view.

The better apraoch is vary exposure slightly between frames and perhaps do it differently where frames are stiched. That is not as simple task even with advanced features of Photoshop.

Now if the all pictures are far from being bright due to sunlight, setting exposure to the same value may help.

By the way, exposure on scenes taken in the snowy montaiins are usually difficult. to do it right you usually need to set your camera to overexposure by 1-2 stops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...