All this discussion is well and good BUT I think one basic design characteristic is being overlooked here. If we assess Catek against all other binding designs within the context of a FMEA, which binding has the greatest potential for a single point failure which can result in a very high to severe injury rating? The king pin design of the Catek, while providing infinite adjustability, is a highly stressed interface and single point of contact with the board.
I had a binding failure at high speed on steep terrain two seasons ago which did cause injury. The bindings were adjusted and maintained iaw manufacturer instructions but there was no way of identifying the potential shearing of the king pin shoulder. I promptly sold all bindings and parts with full disclosure on what had happened. Adjustability is great, but safety is paramount. Yes I'm a big guy. Yes I ride hard. Yes I like all of my body parts to remain attached, functional and operate within their design limitations. Thats why I switched camps. And lets face it, none of us are getting any younger!!
(5)stance width
(3)binding angle
(4)cant
(6)lift
(2)boot bias
(1)boot tension