BobD Posted June 29, 2016 Report Share Posted June 29, 2016 or there won't be any foreign carvers at SES next winter.... http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36650857 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corey Posted June 29, 2016 Report Share Posted June 29, 2016 However, revealing this information would be "optional". What about people that legitimately aren't on social media? How do you treat them differently than someone that's hiding something and won't reveal their details? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted June 29, 2016 Report Share Posted June 29, 2016 If someone posted a bunch of jihadist threats etc on their social media network, why would they share their profile information? It's a choice between possibly getting rejected for not handing over your information and definitely getting rejected and being added to a watch list. Seems like governmental overreach and a waste of time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordmetroland Posted June 29, 2016 Report Share Posted June 29, 2016 It does give us a legitimate reason to debate which is dumber, social media or government. It's a tough call... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.