Jump to content
Note to New Members ×

Madd BX CR 157 Prototype


ur13

Recommended Posts

I don't know a whole lot about this board. I bought it directly from Madd Mike a few months before the first run of New Madds (like the one Jack is currently selling). This was a prototype that Madd Mike built for Boardercross (to get around the square tail rules when alpine boards still raced in BX), as I remember around 2001'ish (maybe someone here knows more about this, Gilmour?). It's dimensions are as follows;

157cm

8.8m sidecut

18.8 waist

Basically it is fairly close to the Madd 158 dimension-wise, with a fuller nose, higher camber and BX tail. It's capped construction and very (I'll say it) crudely built cosmetically (it's ugly as sin). It also has standard inserts, not the brass ones. The carbon in it is rough and crude and overall the board is very much a prototype.

All that being said it's a fun ride. A very springy and stiff ride and given it's a capped board it doesn't feel like one. I put maybe 8 days on it but ended up getting a few other boards shortly afterward and didn't ride this much.

The base is clean and the edges are solid and beefy. It currently has a crude tune on it (89*/0*base) with my hand file guide and is in need of a wax. The top sheet is a soft material and has some small nicks in it but overall the board is in very good shape, the base is clean and beyond obviously being a prototype the board is perfectly rideable.

I'll tell you one thing. You won't see many of these out on the hill, or anywhere else for that matter.

Pay-pal is preferred but a USPS money order will work.

I'll ship ONLY within the USA. Sorry.

$165 including USPS Shipping takes it (most likely First class, 7-12 days across the country from NYC, USPS Priority is just too expensive shipping boards now-a-days)

If you have questions ask.

ur13 at hotmail dot com

r0010413.jpg

r0010414.jpg

r0010415.jpg

r0010416.jpg

r0010417.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey I had one of those at 168cm. It was a lot of fun. Quite springy and stiff.

Bump for you! :)

You had one? What do you know about it? Do you have more details than I gave? I'm curious about it. I don't remember the story Mike told me when I talkes to him years ago...

if that's stiff enough for a 200+ pounder I'm interested.

email coming

I was 210 at the time I rode it and it would have NO problem shooting me off into the woods on it's whim. So ya, it will work for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You had one? What do you know about it? Do you have more details than I gave? I'm curious about it. I don't remember the story Mike told me when I talkes to him years ago...

I had a 167 (or 8?) that I got from Shaggy about 5-6 years ago. It looked pretty similar to yours with carbon stringers and CF "wings" near the bindings. These were Madd's attempts at getting back into the alpine game with different shapes as far as I know. It was pretty stiff and damp as I remember and handled ice (well what us wussie west-coast riders call ice) quite nicely. It had a 9-9.5m radius if I remember, and the cool looking tail you got there. I do wish I still had it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a 167 (or 8?) that I got from Shaggy about 5-6 years ago. It looked pretty similar to yours with carbon stringers and CF "wings" near the bindings. These were Madd's attempts at getting back into the alpine game with different shapes as far as I know. It was pretty stiff and damp as I remember and handled ice (well what us wussie west-coast riders call ice) quite nicely. It had a 9-9.5m radius if I remember, and the cool looking tail you got there. I do wish I still had it.

Interesting. I can't remember if this is a 157 or 158...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is from the same batch that I had, I think it actually may have been called a 156.

Who knows what the real lenght really is, or if it even matters. I had my classic 158 next to my gf's 154 Atomic skis and my board only had about a centimeter on it even though they are labeled 4cm apart. I know my wee little 158 holds my 190 lbs just fine at full tilt though :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is from the same batch that I had, I think it actually may have been called a 156.

Who knows what the real lenght really is, or if it even matters. I had my classic 158 next to my gf's 154 Atomic skis and my board only had about a centimeter on it even though they are labeled 4cm apart. I know my wee little 158 holds my 190 lbs just fine at full tilt though :).

It does match my Madd 158 closely. If my Madd 158 is actually 158 (I've never measured it) then this board is 157.6'ish, and that could be from the sweep in the tail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...