David Kirk Posted March 13, 2019 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 1 minute ago, BlueB said: That's the correct way to call it... As an instructor and clinician I always stayed away from using the word "stance" when referring to anything other than the width and angle of the binding set up on the board just to keep it simple. But I totally get what you are saying - thanks for the response. dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueB Posted March 14, 2019 Report Share Posted March 14, 2019 You are correct about that too. I didn't call it a stance, other's did. I only explained what they meant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kirk Posted March 14, 2019 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2019 2 hours ago, BlueB said: You are correct about that too. I didn't call it a stance, other's did. I only explained what they meant. Right you are of course. Thanks for the info. dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chouinard Posted March 15, 2019 Report Share Posted March 15, 2019 On 3/12/2019 at 3:32 PM, Buell said: Did you have any thoughts on edge change effort and speed? What about slow speed turn initiation on cat tracks and such? Easier to change edges for sure with just bindings which logically suggests it would be faster without the plates. Slow speed turn initiation on a cat track. It's always been a challenge for me since I rode a Burton Asymmetric M6 for so long and got into the bad habit of always riding an edge thru flats for fear of hooking the floppy nose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.