Jump to content

Neil Gendzwill

Gold Member
  • Posts

    5,223
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    70

Posts posted by Neil Gendzwill

  1. My knees should be more bent, I am a poor example in that regard. 
     

    As far as committing early from a traverse, you don’t need so much speed but you do need commitment.   Especially going from toeside to heelside, you have to be willing to huck it blind and that takes some faith in your edge. 
     

    ETA: look at this video, especially around the 5:33 mark where Corey talks about early pressure and carving the downhill edge. Watch him demo, he’s not going fast and he’s on an easy blue. (Aside: was this really 10 years ago? Yikes!)
     

     

    • Like 2
  2. Not that I’m the greatest at getting low but from the video it looks like you are too casual getting on edge. You need to get on edge more aggressively way earlier in the turn than you think you can. The other tip I found useful is to actively drive the back kneecap into the snow on toeside and the side of the front knee into the snow on heelside. 
     

    From the stills, on the toeside to me your shoulders are too open and you are artificially reaching for the snow. You need more angulation. Try the drill of reaching for your front boot cuff with your front hand. This will line up your shoulders better and force you to bend your knees and angulate more.  Let the snow come to you, don’t reach for it. 

    • Like 3
  3. 5 minutes ago, VSR-Alex said:

    I'm assuming you tried orienting the binding disk width-wise?
    If yes, then your binding size might be too big.
    I sized down the binding on purpose for my Burton Cartels due to this problem.
    It's hard to do that with step-ons as the toe receiver needs to be aligned with the boot
    Burton bindings are just...weird.

    Other option is to find some Donek BX plates and then you have full customization of the lateral stance position.
    Hard to find those though, as they are not made anymore.
    Still, an ordinary riser plate will allow higher edge angles without needing to shift the binding.

    It’s impossible to size down the stepon without dropping boot size as well. You get the size they recommend otherwise it won’t work. 

    • Like 1
  4. 16 hours ago, ShortcutToMoncton said:

    This feels like the only snowboard I’ve ever seen I would not actually ride! Put that thing safely on a wall and chat about it with your grandkids one day. 

    Yeah, and I got that price wrong, it was in USD so tack on another 30% for those of us in North Canuckistan. 
     

    ETA: apparently I was right the first time. Still, $CDN2473 is a lot for a snowboard. 

  5. I wouldn't say people shit on them but they have been criticized for being too stiff in the past.  They're not too popular with racers partly for that reason.  I think some of that is racers sticking with what they know.  Mostly people here love them but I note we are in the racing forum so...

  6. 17 minutes ago, st_lupo said:

    On a softboot setup wouldn’t a toeside be the harder side since there is less mechanical advantage and support?

    I find toesides way easier in softies even though toe and heel are about the same for me on hard boots.  However if you look at the video closely it looks like they have biased the bindings towards toeside turns, he's going to boot out on heelside if he tries it.

    • Like 1
  7. I still don’t understand what the OP wants this board for. He’s posed some questions about what the hardboot community in general wants out of a softboot board but that doesn’t matter. What do you want to do with this board?

    Personally I think there’s a lot of overthinking on gear here. When I went shopping I looked for boards that were recommended for what I want to do (all mountain freeride), picked one and reckoned if others liked it I could also make it work. There’s probably 10 other boards that would have worked just as well.  Whatever you pick, you will have to adjust to and make work. 

    • Thanks 1
  8. 1 hour ago, carvedog said:

    There was a lot of this going on. Carver (actual name) rips on whatever he is on. His Dad team carving with him in the background. New Nikon 7ii. And they say it’s not a ‘sports’ camera with up to 10 frames per second full frame 45 mp. Worked great for me. 

    Is that the dude with the dark beard?  So many pics of him killing it!

  9. I have a 2020 Flagship and I like it quite a lot.  But I didn't buy it to be a carving board, if I want to carve I will get out my hardboot gear.  Having said that, if I'm on the groom it does fine although it is pretty soft and the sidecut is short by our standards (9.3m or something like that). 

    Take my advice with a huge grain of salt as I don't have any other soft boot boards to compare it to. It is my first softie setup in 3 decades.

    • Like 1
  10. 6 hours ago, Eastsiiiide said:

    Interesting. Why?

    I'm guessing this boils down to the geometry of angles/boots/bindings in relation to overhang/leverage/stiffness/control, but I'm not certain that there isn't some other factor inherent to a wider board that's involved in your minimum width preference.  Is there?

    Yes, just straight geometry. Unless you have teeny feet and run steep angles, 23 cm is too narrow for soft boots. The conventional width of 25 cm is doable if you intend to run steep angles, like near the limits soft boots support. Right now I am on a mid-wide (26.3 cm) running a pretty standard forward stance (12/27) with size 10 boots. I think I would boot out if I could lay it over as hard as I can in hard boots.  It is OK for now as I did not get this setup for dedicated carving.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...