Jump to content

mirror70

Member
  • Posts

    721
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mirror70

  1. Includes:

    48" Cross bars

    Ski/snowboard attachment ("Big Powderhound")

    38" front fairing

    Locks

    Fits the B5 A4 and S4 perfectly.

    Fits A6 except for front fairing (Yakima recommends the 44").

    Used but still in excellent condition.

    List price is $432.

    I will take $300, shipped in the US.

  2. The reason for a releasable binding on a ski is that you can twist your leg off if you fall and turn. On a snowboard, since both legs are attached to the same plane, your legs cannot be twisted; your hips twist instead. I've never heard of injuries due to this.

    Problems I see with releasable snowboard bindings:

    [*]Figuring out when it is that you would want to release

    [*]Making the release happen

    [*]Making both bindings release, to avoid the ski problem mentioned above

    [*]Making a brake mechanism so that boards wouldn't go launching down the hill, but also so leashes wouldn't be required

    [*]Since people ride with such a wide range of stance angles, the range of "unsafe" motion varies hugely. One rider's unsafe (a duck-footer leaning towards the front of the board) may be an essential part of another's technique (someone riding 60/45 putting some weight on the nose)

    [/list=1]

    There is one situation in which a manually releasable binding would be useful: when riding deep powder. The ability to release your binding without reaching your board is potential a major safety enhancement if you're riding off-piste or in anything deep.

  3. Jack,

    I spoke with Beckman last weekend. He'd like to see some sort of hardbooter gathering this year. Perhaps the three of us can put something together.

    As for people breaking boards, I think a large part of it is a macho thing. Certainly accidents do happen, but if someone is regularly breaking boards then he is clearly doing something pretty wrong, and covering it up with "I'm just too tough for the equipment."

    I did break a board once, but it was entirely due to abuse. I overshot a table and landed on the tail - SNAP!

  4. Originally posted by Fleaman

    sometimes when I stand around in the lift line or just starting a run, I will fall down and flail like a beached whale for no reason.

    Is it a problem if I do that w/o a snowboard? I mean while standing in line in street shows or something. Oops :)

    Oldsnwbrdr - I find that because of the higher angles and stiffer boots, getting off of the lift is actually easer on one of these setups - especially on the heelside.

  5. Originally posted by Jack Michaud

    Even today, most skiers dont <i>get it</i>. I won a free subscription to Skiing magazine at a Warren Miller movie, and the ski tests they do never list sidecut radius. Hello??

    Also I just checked the websites for Atomic and Rossignol - they both only list sidecut radius for one length of any particular model. I say again - Hello???

    Isn't this because the sidecut matters less with a ski because they flex so much more? The so-called "natural arc" of a snow-riding tool is not purely a function of its sidecut. With flex characteristics varying so much, giving only the sidecut can be misleading.

    Also, it's not uncommon for skis of the same family but different lengths to have the same sidecut radius. There is no technical reason for this, it's simply because people would think the skis look funny otherwise.

  6. If it's 45minutes in good weather, then I bet that when it snows I'll do it in 25 :D :D

    CSM didn't really have any appropriate rentals. They primarily had houses and condos for sale, and their rentals are for people looking to be there for a week or so.

    I haven't reached Beckman yet. Do you have a number where I could reach him directly, or is my best bet to call the front desk and see if they can find him? Or am I likely to see him while I'm up there this weekend?

×
×
  • Create New...