Jump to content

Slow Eddie

Member
  • Posts

    172
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Slow Eddie

  1. I own an older version of this thing:

    http://www.geardirect.com/Products/Skiing/Accessories/ChinookSports/Port-A-DryerBootDryer/3286.cfm?cart_id=0655511001111034949571605720041411&store_id=1

    It was called "The Evaporator: The Ultimate Boot Dryer" back then and I thought it only cost about $50. Anyway, it's quiet enought that I can sleep next to it - but, anyone who slept at the Bomber Condo at ECES '04 can tell you that I can drown out anything less than a 2-stroke generator :) Seriously, it is quiet, and efficient enough that if I put a pair of boots and gloves on when I get home from a day of riding, I can turn the thing off before going to sleep and that's still enough time to dry things out for the next day. It packs into a nylon bag about the diameter of a round tin of Danish Butter Cookies and half again as tall. I use it in the summertime for cycling shoes, inline skates, etc.

  2. On the "Products" page, it looks like the blurb for the Phoenix should be longer than the one line that is shown.

    On the "About Us" page, under "Technology Matters", the word "it's" should be "its".

    Otherwise, so far so good - excellent site, Sean (and Jen and everybody)!

    Eddie

  3. Anybody ride here, once or often? The mountain is near Queensbury/Glens Falls, and the local shop is The Inside Edge (The Reliable Racing folks). My fiance's little bro is getting into riding this year, and while I have an E deck for mellow cruising and teaching, I'm wondering if it's worth it to bring a bigger stick along.

    Thanks,

    Eddie

  4. It'll be playing at the Flynn in Burlington, and Sugarbush usually kicks in a free ticket to moviegoers, but it's only goods in the early season (like before Christmas week) - good excuse to pull out the rock board. Unfortunately, it's been a while since I've seen any carving coverage in a WM filck, so I have to revert to my tele persona and dream of powder and pins for the week after the movie shows.

  5. Congrats on the bike; I'm gald you took the time to get the fit right.

    Don't be afraid to reassess and fine-tune the fit, either; as you put on more miles, you might find that you need slight changes in your position to improve comfort and efficiency.

    I mentioned the shop I'm wrenching in this summer in another post about tri's in New England, but since the business is dedicated to bike fitting, be it road or tri, it's worth plugging again here.

    Fit Werx is a small shop in the Mad River Valley (Waitsfield, VT; think Sugarbush North) that specializes in bike fitting. Having worked in the bike industry for a number of years I felt I had a pretty good handle on how my bike fit, but after going through a fitting session at the shop (be prepared to spend half a day), the sutble adjustments to my position have definitely made an improvement in the comfort and efficiency of my riding.

    In the interests of full disclosure, let me say again that I am the mechanic at this shop during the summer months; but we do regularly get clients who come from throughout New England, and from cities with very reputable LBS's, because of the services that we offer.

    As a long-time alpiner, I can appreciate the effects seemingly miniscule changes in position can have on performance. I never thought that principle could carry over to cycling as well.

    Anyway, check us out! And tell Sarah and Ian that Eddie sent you.

    www.fitwerx.com

  6. Wolfgang - thanks for the clarification. We're on the same page now.

    Jack - I see what you mean about measuring between where the uncambered deck touches the floor, but when the deck is weighted and tipped onto its edge, wouldn't the widest points of the board define the endpoints of the running length/chord length anyway?

    Eddie

  7. I was, in fact, using the entire chord length for d, rather than one-half the chord length. But having made the corrections, now I'm getting an r value of 8.275 m - about half of what you got. Must be something else wrong on my end - the 16.5 m you got sounds about right for the feel of this board.

    Good thing I'm not an engineer.

    And in response to Jack's comments, perhaps I will try the paper-under-the-base method and redo my measurements.

    Thanks to both for the input.

    Eddie

  8. Hi All,

    I was trying to figure out the sidecut radius of one of the boards I own. Here are what I thought to be the pertinent dimensions:

    Nose Width (defined as widest point forward of center) = 233 mm

    Waist Width (defined as narrowest point of board) = 188 mm

    Tail Width (defined as widest point aft of center) = 229 mm

    Distance between widest points of nose and tail, at edge = 1685 mm.

    Making the assumption that the radius is constant, and the taper from front to back is a product of "rotating" the sidecut towards the rear of the board, rather than using two different sidecuts, the average "wide" width of the board was considered to be 231 mm, yielding a difference in width of 43 mm ("sidecut depth", in Burton lingo).

    Those familiar with geometry can see where I am going with this one. The straight-line distance can be regarded as a chord of a circle with a radius of r. The sidecut depth can be regarded as the sagitta of said chord. According to the formula for determining the radius of a circle from these two pieces of information, which I found here...

    http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/55037.html

    ...the radius of the circle that matches those dimesnsions is 33035 mm, or 33 meters! Now, even for a custom-built 185 cm board, isn't that a little excessive?

    Perhaps there is a problem with my math. Does the equation seem to be a valid method to derive the number I'm looking for? I triple-checked my measurements, so I hope there's no error there.

    Does anyone out there have a more reliable way of determining sidecut radius?

    Thanks,

    Eddie Plantilla

×
×
  • Create New...