Jump to content

snowcat_az

Member
  • Posts

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by snowcat_az

  1. Walk mode.

    Main reason is that it gives much greater range of motion up-down and forth-back, which I think is essential for efficient technique, maneuverability and switching riding styles. Also, I do 60/60 setup, so most edge pressure is generated off steering with knees / pushing sideways, so with reasonable boots forth-back ankle stiffness, it doesn't feel compromised at all. Meanwhile, locking the boots results in constantly fighting against them when trying to move COG or load/unload the board.

    Ride mode would probably be beneficial for more aggressive binding angles, like 45/45 or steeper. But then it's completely different body mechanics.

  2. 8 hours ago, JetSpeed said:

    Available ???

    Yes, still looking for the new home.

    Shipping to France would be economically unreasonable though.

    On 5/1/2020 at 7:05 PM, GileslikestoCarve said:

    Just looking at all the options! Sorry. Did not know if the boards were still available. I’m really looking for a freeride or all mountain board about 175 with a waist around 21cm. I ride on groomed, icy, lumpy, slush slopes 

    Somehow overlooked your answer.

    If you already have decent experience, then yes, longer is the way to go.

  3. For sale - perfect budgetary second board - decent length, good edge hold and dampening, yet softer flex for easier control. Solid response, great for pumping, as well as speed coasting.

    $120 - 2006 F2 Speedster RS 177, 15 m sidecut, 19 cm waist, 75..95 kg rider weight.

    Shipping additional, from 85286.

    123335633_IMG_20200206_121025(Custom).jpg.8acb9d8fe90ca78d5ba73ac96a3c13e0.jpg

    1132689667_IMG_20200206_111514(Custom).jpg.8e39c528bb1fe510cc781626a652bdb8.jpg77669642_IMG_20200206_111523(Custom).jpg.8714218a83ec78fda9df15c0f42ee0ee.jpg1697569239_IMG_20200206_111537(Custom).jpg.33787f1e2e8b0d26889ec957b591e82a.jpg421308061_IMG_20200206_111541(Custom).jpg.364fe933c437f75ba0f8439d5a9214a9.jpg2068577552_IMG_20200206_111346(Custom).jpg.f4d88d95236cc045e54282a7aae93e39.jpg409366250_IMG_20200206_111354(Custom).jpg.11b74f2c3483e2356a845c36cf69eb05.jpg1154381489_IMG_20200206_111358(Custom).jpg.f68928ba6124c4df0c419823a575e32d.jpg103459053_IMG_20200206_111402(Custom).jpg.914bdc8d274a9e6fe0f63601c478e95c.jpg1464173952_IMG_20200206_111433(Custom).jpg.c2d2b94079413ee53b47ee14ba859ae2.jpg

    • Like 1
  4. For sale - perfect first-time / recreational all-mountain setup.

    F2 Speedster GTS 166 - 9.8 m sidecut, 20 cm waist, 75..95 kg rider weight. Has signs of use, but nothing significant; just had edge tuned to 1 / 88 deg. Ready to ride.

    F2 Titanium Race bindings - white, size S, barely used.

    $300 combined.

    Shipping additional from 85286.

    Track 325 Mondo 28 / US 10.5, 3 easy seasons, thermofit once +$100

     

    IMG_20200206_112154 (Custom).jpg

    IMG_20200206_112210 (Custom).jpg

    IMG_20200206_112216 (Custom).jpg

    IMG_20200206_112231 (Custom).jpg

    IMG_20200206_112241 (Custom).jpg

    IMG_20200206_112249 (Custom).jpg

    IMG_20200206_112322 (Custom).jpg

    IMG_20200206_112336 (Custom).jpg

    IMG_20200206_112340 (Custom).jpg

    IMG_20200206_112342 (Custom).jpg

    IMG_20200206_112349 (Custom).jpg

    IMG_20200206_112424 (Custom).jpg

    IMG_20200206_112458 (Custom).jpg

    1984670230_PXL_20201219_175811436_2(Custom).jpg.5b8358ab70b82cffb995385268185a4c.jpg

  5. Alright, just got back from the snowboarding tour.

    The new WCRM has touched Brian Head, Sierra-At-Tahoe, Kirkwood, Sugar Bowl and Snowbowl so far. One more forum member has also ridden it, and might comment.

    So the practical difference feels negligible. Stiffer -- yes, but smaller SCR compensates a bit, like expected. Lower chance of nose hook-up though. Can't say it's much more damping either, and edge hold is similar, although Speedster has 1 / 88 deg, and WCRM -- supposedly 0 / 89 deg. Seems that WCRM is more strict on morning icy spring hard pack. By the 6th snow day got a feeling that it induces more aggressive riding style (which is probably a good sign), but that may be just because of consecutive days of practice.

    Basically, despite subjectively I like WCRM much better, from the practical perspective nothing is wrong with the Speedster either.

    Funny thing happened with another Speedster, GTS 166, which has been retired for few years due to soft flex and tight SCR (10 m?). Suddenly, during re-evaluation it demonstrated decent edge hold and super easy handling, thus has all chances to become main AMT / steep slope / busy day board.

    • Like 1
  6. 1 hour ago, skidad62 said:

    I live in Canada’s snowiest city... want some for your yard?  Lol

    I did Phoenix for Christmas - loved it!

    OMG ! Sure, can you email a little ?

    And yes, AZ is a fantastic place in many aspects, snow sports is just not one of them. Still, I'm spending more time on the slopes now, than I was doing back in Russia 10 yrs ago.

  7. @skidad62, saw your posting. Proteus 175 was on my list first, but 2 things I don't like about it are 12m SCR (may be too tight vs 14m it's supposed to replace) and straight cut tail. Weight range not specified which adds more ambiguity.

    Curious how single-SCR Metal FC would compare, as it's closer to what I wanted shape-wise.

    Anyway, customizing either of them would be over 1200 and few weeks delivered. Which I wouldn't mind if I didn't see that WCRM 177 with presumably right specs and similar composition, already in stock.

  8. 20 hours ago, billyt. said:

    Find what is limiting your enjoyment with your gear?

    Brutal Arizonian winters are limiting it !

    At 250 lb I bet your Coiler is stiffer than stock.

    1 hour ago, pauleleven said:

    See if they could buff up the flex a little bit for your weight, you'd be a little bit on the end of the spectrum. It's a reputable board maker and fits your requirement really well tho.

    Another option is to add a vist plate to it, which will buff the flex a bit,  but I would say ride it naked until you are absolutely bending the S*** out of it before going with a plate.

    I would be comfortable with more stiffness if SCR went smaller (as I still need full control at steeper slopes and around people). But I cannot predict how that combination would work. And I don't know how much stiffness the Speedster lost in 10 years as I can do probably 5..6 m clean turns (which I actually like). So brand new with little higher initial stiffness and metal composition may already be above desired stiffness. Otherwise - yes, VIST plate is an option.

    26 minutes ago, BlueB said:

    WCRM doesn't ride like Kessler and similar race boards. It's rounder and more predictable turn shape. 

    That's about what I need.

×
×
  • Create New...