Jump to content

JohnE

Member
  • Posts

    557
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by JohnE

  1. It seems like more and more people are "transitioning" from hardboots to soft.

    My expectation was that softboot carving would be the "gateway drug" into hardboots.

    I'm not familiar with the origins of hardbooting but it seems like it is an offshoot of snowboard racing (correct?). Softboot snowboarding came from the surfing / skateboard culture. Softboot carving was an attempt to carve with gear from that culture (?).   

    Is it possible that this is a convergent evolution? If we fastforward 5 or 10 years most carvers will be using gear that is some hybrid of hard and softboot gear? Hardbooting will remain for racers and those who have to carve on very hard snow? 

    • Like 1
  2. I've also bought a pair of risers from Donek. These raise the binding off the deck by 1/2". I don't have them mounted now because early season snow is pretty hard and boot drag is less of an issue. However, when the snow softens up, I may install them. 

     

    9 hours ago, TWM said:

    I hope to be still railing turns at your age. Cheers; well done. Yours is quite similar to my soft boot carver this season -- a Donek Saber with 30.5 cm waist, Nitro Phantom Carvers, and Nidecker Talons. I'll post full reviews, but, thus far, I've found the combination of damp, controlled, high-angle carving and a plush, firm boot-binding interface very fun and comfortable.

    One of my riding buddies (Arne) is still carving beautifully at 71 or 72 y.o. with 2x artificial knees and 2x artificial hips. He rides both hard & soft boots. Also, Softbootsurfer on this site is 76 y.o. this year. He rides 100 days/season at Buttermilk. He is super graceful and a real inspiration. 

    • Like 2
  3. When I hear tales of collisions (or near collisions) it really makes me shudder. Glad you weren't hurt. Even if you don't get hurt physically, you stand the chance of getting hurt legally. 

    Riding mid-week doesn't eliminate the risk but it does reduce it significantly. There are fewer slope sliders and the people out there tend to be older local skiers. They tend to be more aware, more capable and more cautious. 

    Be careful out there. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  4. John - I'm stuck in a pretty deep rut. I ride almost exclusively at Loveland. They have some new groomer cats and they have been doing a really great job of grooming lately. So I don't have to deal with scraped off / blown off snow. If the snow gets too icy, I discover that I'm not as good a carver as I imagine. 

    I meet some college buddies once a year for 2 days at Vail. Last year their groom report showed that most of the mountain had been groomed. WHAT A LIE! Yes - maybe it had been groomed at some point in the past but certainly not in the last 24 hours. The snow was really scraped off and it sucked! 

    Odd Job - you can switch between pretty high angles on hardboots to being nearly zero on softies and this doesn't confuse you? I could just never get comfortable at high angles. What is your boot size? What is the waist width on your soft board? Do you get much overhang or boot drag? Do you use risers of any kind? 

    My new board has a 27cm waist. I wear size 10 boots. If I try to get near zero angles, I do get some boot overhang. I don't know if this will translate to boot-out. 

  5. I was thinking of cutting a ski pole down to maybe 16" or so, putting a small crutch tip to each end and creating a velcro "holster" on the outside of my rear calf.

    Each time you approach the lift, you pull the wand out of it's holster, release the rear binding and put it back in the holster.  

    Am I overthinking this?

  6. On 11/19/2022 at 8:46 AM, TWM said:

    Great discussion.

    I love hard-booting, but I prefer the feeling of soft boot carving. It begets the flow, fluidity, and body English that, for me (and perhaps not you) gets to the heart of what's beautiful about snowboarding.

    Think: Craig Kelly. I was lucky, early in life, to take a few groomer runs with Craig at Snowmass. Seeing him ride in person burned into my brain a peak potential of soft boot carving, or, for that matter, any carving: very, very fast, always on rail, pencil-thin lines, very large radius turns, and very controlled but with very pronounced use of hips, a rear driving/rudder arm, and fore-aft weight throws accelerating out of turns and off of terrain. And then he'd flip around and do it fakie--at the same speed.

    Craig's soft boot carving blew me away at a time, in 1990 I think it was, when we were first pioneering 55 degree stance angle and hip-dragging heel turns on steep groom--pioneering in the sense that, back then, before the days of youtube or social media, we were making turns that we'd never seen others make. It was a revolutionary and exhilarating time. Yet, even amidst that, Craig's carving was clearly supreme.

    His aesthetic of grace at speed deeply influenced my own riding. It drew me, after my racing stint, quickly back to soft boots. I sought out long boards--like the 195 Glissade big guns--that afforded deep, damp stability railing long radius turns at high speeds.

    At the heart of that transition from hard back to soft boots were heel turns and the issues of shoulder squaring, hip rotation, stance angles, boot-out and lost lateral leverage. For me, a front foot at 35-40 degrees and a forward-driving back knee, helped by heel lift and/or canting, affords hip rotation I need for a heel turn to feel right. The resultant forward pressure requires boards with enough forward profile and stiffness to not fold. Extra stiff boots--especially on my front foot--Talons--help with lateral leverage. Extra wide carving boards at long last resolve boot-out.

    Admittedly, when I do break out the hard boots--and it's rare these days--I'm guilty of still riding 90s-era race board prototypes. They rip, but are also lively to the point of being rude and rambunctious--too much so for a guy nearing 50. I like to think they showcase a rider's rustiness. Many posts on these forums mention the advances in GS alpine board technology--grippier, quieter, more stable and easier to ride. I'm eager to try one. It may well draw me back into more hard booting days.

     

     

     

     

     

    Agreed with most of this. My new setup is a new Donek Flux with a 27cm waist, Nidecker Supermatics and Nidecker (Flow) Talons. When carpet carving I'm finding that lower and lower angles feel more natural and stable to me. I haven't been on the snow yet this season but I'm anxious to try out this new setup. At 66 years old I need to keep this going as long as I can. 

    • Like 1
  7. Has anyone thought about how we can release the rear binding without having to bend down all the way until your finger almost touches the topsheet? I've thought about some sort of wand - maybe 16" long that you could reach down & release. Problem is where to store the wand when you are riding? Probably not a concern if you're under 50yo. 

  8. Well I've sold off most of my hardboot gear and I've bought only midweek passes for the last several years so I won't be joining the Sunday crew any more. 

    I worked and worked at hardbooting but just never got comfortable with it. Now I'm strictly a mid-week softbooter but I'm having a blast. 

    I'd like to express my gratitude to the Sunday crew for getting me addicted to carving. Especially to Derek and Mario for all of your tips, lessons & encouragement. I still recall riding up Lift #2 with my regular snowboard gear and seeing the crew carving up weeks old snow and thinking "that looks like fun!".

    Several weeks later I had bought my first used hardboot setup. I was riding up Lift 6 by myself and the guy ahead of me asked "how are you liking your plate setup?". That was the first time I met Derek. I expected you guys to be elitist and exclusionary. The opposite was true. 

    I've worked & worked at it and have enjoyed every moment. Carving is the most fun thing in my life.  

    Thanks again to all of the Sunday crew. Maybe we'll see you up at Loveland some weekday this season! 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
  9. Thanks for all the collective wisdom. I have never raced and have no desire to. For me the high angles of hardboots on a relatively narrow board never felt "natural". Driving my knees side-to-side doesn't feel as natural as driving them forward and driving my butt back. 

    I may not carve as well as the best hardbooters but I am having fun. Aside from people like Ryan Knapton and some online videos like Kira, the most beautiful carvers are the best hardbooters. 

    • Like 1
  10. Don't know if this topic has been discussed earlier. The biggest dividing line here is probably hardboot -vs- softboot carving. Some do both. 

    It seems to me that aside from the stiffness of the boots the biggest difference is in the width of the board and the angles one can ride. 

    If that is so, why wouldn't someone put plate bindings on a wide board and ride at low angles? Why wouldn't someone put softboot bindings on a narrow board and ride that way? There must be some advantages (and disadvantages) of each. 

    I started from "regular" snowboarding and loved soft snow and powder. Then I saw a group of guys on hardboots having a blast on weeks old snow. I gave hardbooting a try for many years but never got comfortable (or very good at carving). I never got comfortable at those high angles. So I reverted to softboot carving and found that suits me best. 

    What is the fundamental difference? 

  11. Another comment: To get out of the binding you have to push a small lever down near the inside of your rear heel. The beauty of a binding like this is the ease of getting in / getting out (especially for old guys). Having to reach all the way down to where your finger nearly touches the board may not be much fun. If the lever were a pull instead of a push you could attach a leash that could wrap around your knee so you wouldn't have to reach so far. It would be more like an Intech binding (pull to exit). 

    These bindings were obviously well engineered. I wonder why they didn't make this a pull instead of a push? Maybe because a pull might unintentionally get released?

     

  12. 9 hours ago, Jarcode said:

    For kinematics, net acceleration at the "crux" of a turn would be a combination of gravity, slope, friction, and normal forces. The way you would represent this vector using cartesian coordinates certainly results in a "combination of X, Y, and Z".

    Strictly speaking, "acceleration" requires a direction. If you're looking for the magnitude of a vector, you want sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2). If you want to translate the result into fancy "G force" terms, divide by 9.8.

     

    Thanks for the physics refresher. It's been a long time since college. Probably have to download the data into a program to do an ongoing calculation to find the max acceleration as you descend a slope. 

    I think a phone in a pocket would show a better representation of what your body is experiencing that a smart watch. The watch would show the acceleration of your wrist which is likely higher frequency / higher amplitude than your body. 

  13. Has anyone carried their smartphone while riding with the Accelerometer app turned on? It looks like it records triaxial (X,Y & Z) acceleration. The purpose might be to capture maximum acceleration at the apex of a turn. It's unlikely that that max acceleration would be purely X, Y or Z but some combination. I kind of forget but there is math involved in summing the 3 axes. 

    Has anyone done this? Is it interesting?

×
×
  • Create New...