-
Posts
7,656 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
46
Content Type
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Events
Profiles
Forums
Posts posted by BlueB
-
-
3 hours ago, Jack M said:
Centering the boot on the binding and centering the binding on the board is a good practice, but not the only way. Then both your feet are aligned and levering the board on the same axis. Due to the hourglass figure of the board, this usually results in your front foot toe and rear foot heel being inside the edge of the board - "underhang". You can compensate for this by moving the front foot toe and heel blocks forward, and the rear foot toe and heel blocks rearward. This way you can really geek out and zero in on a stance that minimizes both binding angle and underhang.
John Gilmour of Madd Snowboards stamps his name on this as "Gilmour Bias" but he didn't invent it. Maybe he was the first to describe it online. You can search that term here and see his thread about it. I've tried it (before reading about it) and I'm not sure it amounts to a hill of beans for my riding. YMMV
I think he actually tries to have front toe underhang and rear heel underhang, for what he describes as "G" bias.
-
-
And finally done... Staff only closing day was a success, few hours of riding and BBQ Snow was getting progressively slower through the day, but fun never the less. Nidecker Spectre was the ride of the day...
Anyways, thanks everyone for the season, see you next year, if not for one last ride at Whistler, in May.
-
Yup, it was a lot longer pond and hard run-up with a carved corner. Lots of people didn't make it across. 4807 performed like a star, as usual. A sasquatch was spotted, too. Note to myself - dress more often like one - when random girls start asking for photos with you, you are doing something right
- 1
-
Don't concern yourself with the angles at all. Set the rear boot to the edges, or slight overhang, front boot to desired splay and go ride. It works for any board width. Our bodies are super adaptable. After few runs you get used to any new angles.
- 6
-
My buddy Alex is officially a snowboarder now - can link the turns down the Easy Rider. Panorama was a bit more challenging, but he made it down in one piece
Thanks to Patrick and Luka for taking turns in keeeping company to us. Thanks to Rod for donating a snowboard.
My teaching board today - Arbor koa Munoz. She's such a beauty!
-
It was a fun day, today. Fast, almost frozen snow in the am, a bit mushy in the pm. Run of the day: JJA, mogulled up. The Spectre excelled in the afternoon stuff.
-
Hmm, time to sell my Volant?
- 3
-
-
Nice morning carving, with Patrick and few others, yesterday!
Toy: the baby Coiler VSR
-
10 hours ago, Hug Masso said:
Yes indeed, we NEED TO TALK ABOUT JAMES CHERRY.
Why do we need to talk ABOUT James, when we can talk WITH/TO him, right here?
- 1
-
It was great to be back on snow, last night!
Heavy stuff, but better up on Sky. Run of the day: Rippcord.
-
59 minutes ago, snowburn said:
I wouldn't worry about softer bindings. Boots are flexy enough. At your height 20 1/2 inch stance 40 deg posi posi is a good start
I disagree. Hard boots have very little lateral flex. At low angles that needs to come from somewhere - the bindings.
Angles have very little to do with the rider's height, but with the board width and the boot size. Splay is the key to having some extra rotational mobility. How much, is the matter of the rider's anatomy.
- 1
-
Go softer with the bindings, like F2 Carve RS or Burton Race Plates/Ibex. Set your hard boots as soft as possible. Even walk mode on the rear...
158 sounds like good size. However, the length is not as crucial as the flex and the width appropriate for your boot size and the angles you want to run.
Set the rear boot to slight overhang, then front to the desired splay. With very low angles, you need less toe/heel lift than on race board, but you might want some inward canting on the rear. If duck, you can go flat, or just inward canting on both.
- 2
-
2 hours ago, nicholaswmin said:
Some of it comes from those "Midweighting" videos.
It's probably the best to skip those all together...
-
3 minutes ago, nicholaswmin said:
The early edge-change that was recommended earlier, as I understand it, means changing your edge as you're travelling across the fall line instead of while you're going down the fall line. Unless I'm misunderstanding this.
The person in the video doesn't look like he travels across the fall line at all.
I didn't see a single turn where the edge was changed down the fall line.
With symetrical turns, it is impossible to not travel across the fall line, when making a turn. Of course, the board can come to perpendicular to fall line, or to stay short of that, or even travel a bit uphill, but it would always cross the fall line. For clarity, let's exclude the kind of line where your general direction of travel is diagonal to the slope.
- 1
-
4 hours ago, nicholaswmin said:
I've been impressed and confused - these are cross-under turns. The unweighting is done using the rebound of the board?
They aren't even S-turns. I change edge across the fall-line. This guy doesn't even go across the fall-line...
Looks like cross-through to me. Some get closer to cross-over, some to cross-under, as the terrain and tempo dictates. And yes, board rebound should be used in high level riding.
Your last sentence, I don't quite understand... Actually more like, last paragraph.
- 1
-
Can we keep it in one thread?
- 1
-
^ Trenches have been taken already, so I have to settle for smoking the skiers in the mogul runs.
Other than that, I have large Cypress stickers on each side of my helmet.
-
36 minutes ago, Sirui said:
might be riding exhibition or OSV into 5 mile, if accompanying my girlfriend who is learning to carve.
Poor girl, you'll make her learn on those 2 runs Wonderful runs for an accomplished carver, though! Exhibition is probably my favorite.
I'd so much rather be at Peaks, or Cypress right now, than siting in Europe...
-
17 hours ago, SunSurfer said:
@BlueB I need your freecarve binding angles for a typical freecarve board, e.g. 19-22cm at waist.
Let's say 55/50 on 20 waist.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Pat Donnelly said:
Jones & YES are under https://www.nidecker.group/about-us.html
Plus Nidecker themselves.
Also, is Tomahawk still functional?
Apex?
- 2
-
1 hour ago, Grip said:
Coiler BX unscientific measurement = 24.25cm. I think you can use the sidewall code posted above to determine sidecut. She turns easy prob due to softer flex.
Thanks.
Ha, amazing how black makes it look wider than the Cult.
The sidewall code gives: titanal, length, model, year, original owner's initials, flex index with nose decamber.
-
How wide is the BXFR? Looks a fair bit wider then the Cult.
Any idea of the SCR?
Centering boots on bindings
in Carving Central
Posted
He made a typo in explaining what overhangs. Talks twice about rear boot.