Jump to content

gdboytyler

Member
  • Posts

    980
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by gdboytyler

  1. ...I had found some really nice Hestras.  These were really warm, soft and looked awesome!  At $90 I thought I got a good deal.  Then I found the Kincos.  Talk about buyers remorse.  They are just as warm as the Hestras but waaaay more durable (just thicker leather).  And at $20 they are definitely worth it for me.  Additionally, for some reason, they are now considered cool.  Go figure!

     

    Another option is to get army surplus mittens like these:

    http://www.amazon.com/LEATHER-TRIGGER-FINGER-MITTENS-Medium/dp/B002B93CVW/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1457226001&sr=8-2&keywords=army+surplus+mittens

     

    But even I can't rock these.   :cool:  

     

    I find that the 901Ts are fairly water proof, but then again water does not exist in liquid form in the Rockies in the winter.  If you really are worried about water proofing you can just rub this into them:

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001U0KVVC/ref=s9_simh_gw_g468_i2_r?ie=UTF8&fpl=fresh&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=desktop-1&pf_rd_r=1YZZG414WYJWZ8Z80S4C&pf_rd_t=36701&pf_rd_p=2079475242&pf_rd_i=desktop

     

    I don't because I like my gloves very breathable.  YMMV

     

    p.s.  If anybody wants to buy some once-ridden Hestras cheap!  pm me.

     

    I passed on the 901T's because I wanted mittens with a gauntlet and removable liner.  So I'm trying out the surplus mittens with the Nikwax waterproofing.  I'm sure the hardboots/alpine board will get a lot more strange looks than the trigger mittens:-)  Thanks for the heads up Erazz.

     

    Upcoming weekend will be the test run for the surplus mittens.  I'll be stoked if they last a season without needing any ShoeGoo.

  2. I have had some close calls while carving, but the only time I got hit, I was not actively carving.

    I slowed down as I went over a blind roller so that I wouldn't hit anybody. Then a teen snowboarder aired off the roller and slammed into me. I was wearing body armor and a helmet. The teen slammed his head into my helmet and had to take the tobbagon ride to the bottom. The teen got a concussion and bloody mouth. I had a light bruise on my bicep, which I didn't notice until later.

    • Like 1
  3. ^

    ^

    Surfboards and snowboards are not analogs. The rider on snow cannot add appreciably to the system by way of caloric burn.

     

    If you believe that skis and snowboards function differently, then you can conveniently ignore the evolution of ski racing over the last 25 years.

    If not, then you can conclude that snowboard racing should more closely resemble ski racing, but the athletes/coaches have not yet figured out how to get it done.

    That the description does not match the action in your original post suggests that there is a disconnect between knowledge and understanding, and that you might look elsewhere for guidance.

     

    The average rider has little at stake, and can do whatever they choose, and be happy with that choice. Time is generally not a factor.

     

    Relative to pumping to gain speed, surfboards, skateboards and snowboards can be analogous.  When the SB racer extends his legs through the turn, he creates an angular impulse which changes his angular momentum.

     

    I would agree that skis and snowboards function very similarly.  However, if the current world class coaches/athletes can't figure out how to make a SB racer look like a ski racer, then it will be even more difficult for a recreational racer/rider. 

  4. The compression/extension shown in Cirigliano's videos I think are analogous to pumping on a surfboard. So instead of a waste of energy, it adds energy which increases speed.

    The quiet COM that Beckman is talking about seems closer to the technique used by Carve Master Curt in the clip below. However, I don't see any world class racers that ride like CMC. I applaud the riders that are trying to find better techniques, but for the average recreational rider, I say copy what is currently winning.

    • Like 1
  5. There are a lot of instructional videos on the web for extreme carving.  Not so much for racing.

     

    Marc Cirigliano's YoutTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/user/mcirigliano52/videos,  is the best that I've found so far.  I don't race so I don't know if his advice is valid or not.  His advice seems good to me.

     

    His explanations on drifting a turn, entering a gate early or late cleared up the subjects for me.

     

    He's got 15 videos on race technique.  Here's the first one,

     

     

     

    The only real critique I have is that he seems to have confused flex and extend in the diagram below.  From the videos, it looks like the racers "flex" or get compressed in the fall line and "extend" their legs in the edge transition between gates:

     

     

     

     

     

    post-363-0-47092800-1459353449_thumb.png

    • Like 1
  6. Steep, groomed and wide:  I'd go with an EC style board and EC it from top to bottom.  My EC board is a Coiler Schtubby 171 with a 13m side cut.

     

    As mentioned in other threads, EC is not necessary for steeps, but it makes the steeps easier because you're scrubbing speed with body parts.  With less speed, you need less energy to hold your carve, so it's less tiring. 

     

    If it's steep and narrow or the grooming is not so good, then a slalom board is easier.

  7. ...

    So why hardboots?

     

    I thought there use to be a FAQ for this?

     

    Pros:

    • More comfy if fitted properly
    • Shorter sole length = lower binding angle to prevent boot out
    • Better for carving/edge control
    • Wins races
    • Better for splitboarding (if an AT boot)

    I originally got hardboots because soft boots started to kill my feet whenever I carved a turn.

  8. ...

    I want an MK really bad now!   I didn't get a chance to take it up to Deer bowl but have no doubt that it would have excelled.  There should be some photos of it in action.

    If I buy one I'll let you try it on Geronimo next year :cool:

     

     

    LOL, free demos end up getting expensive.

    Definitely interested in trying out the MK if you get one.  It will be good to compare the MK with my SG 157 Full Race.

  9. How would I answer this?

     

    I like riding all terrain but on hardboots can only do green groomers at this point.   Confusing.

    Then maybe your hardboots are too stiff. Depending on the brand, you could install an after market spring system to customize the flex.

    My old Raichle 413's were too stiff in ride mode and too floppy in walk mode. Installing the BTS made the boots good for all terrain riding.

    I'm now using Dynafit AT boots for everything.

    For untracked pow, I'm not sure yet if I prefer hard or soft boots. But once the pow gets tracked out, I definitely prefer hard boots.

    • Like 1
  10. I will be there too!  At least for Saturday.  I know most have a pass but will there be a group rate for lift tickets like in the past?

    We can compare the MK to my 158 reissue.

     

    Did you get to compare your MADD 158 (2nd/3rd gen?) with the MADD Killer?  

     

    Did the MK meet the hype?

     

    Any reviews on the various plate systems?

  11. I've got an Osin 4807 in 168cm. I think I rode it with binding angles in the high 30's. Your wife must be riding her board with a lot of underhang.

    I find shorter boards to be much easier once the snow gets chopped up. My go to powder board is now a Furberg 162. It rides the deep untracked pow just as well as the Osin. It does everything else much better: carving groomers, moguls, chopped up pow etc.

    Furberg now makes boards in women's sizes (shorter and softer flex).

  12. Well it's all a question of style.

     

    To me, the fully lying down stuff is a funny looking trick.

     

    Sigi - if you look at his laid out stuff, it's still a trick, but he's not diving for the snow, more avoiding it if anything. But his non-trick stuff is more interesting, aggressive & dynamic. It's not ballet, it's a speed sport.

     

    I would disagree.  Technique would be the science part and style the artistic part of snowboarding.

     

    Racers tend to be compressed when they cross the fall line.  EC'ers are extended when they cross the fall line.  That would be the technique part.

     

    Sigi and the Extremecarving.com guys (Patrice and Jacques) all look smooth when they are carving turns.  That is the style part.

     

    Downhill and Super-G are speed sports.  I wouldn't call recreational carving a speed sport.

    • Like 3
  13. I recently saw the Sigi Grabner free-carving video. It's the best carving technique that I've seen. Despite the crappy song, it's now one of my favorite carving videos.. My other favorite carving video is CARVED, by the extremecarving.com guys.

    I think it's the two best videos to compare/contrast techniques.

    IMHO, it is much easier to carve a steep run using the EC technique. I don't race, but I did recently buy a SG 157 Full Race. I do quite a bit of EC on a Coiler Schtubby 171.

    I will try emulating Sigi's technique and save some wear and tear on my jacket and gloves:-)

    Race Carving:

    Extreme Carving:

  14. This is the best free carving I've seen, EVER, but sound track sucks. Video has been out about 2.5 years and I just watched it yesterday. So I'd agree with the low visibility/low marketing comments. But as long as we have enough carvers to make sure we continue to get great boards, I'm happy with that.

    As a recreational rider, the only positive I see with a bigger community is the possibility of getting some hard boots that don't need modification to work well.

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...