Jump to content

sabestian

Member
  • Posts

    69
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sabestian

  1. That's exactly why I think that fine adjustments that Cateks offer are so beneficial on skwal. I had to fine tune the cants for my body to be relaxed and equalized over the board. With the bindings flat, I was struggling with body position.

    This comes from a bow legged man with knees without mesial menisci, multilevel discopatia etc. Your results may vary :)

    If you can find this equilibrium without fine tuning, well, lucky you!

  2. Catek has the WORST customer service.

    They actually haven't got one :\

    You are posting in a forum that is owned by a manufacturer that makes his own parts in house and has fantastic customer service.

    100% true.

    IMHO Bomber makes a better product. PERIOD.

    Catek bindings are better as far as adjustments go. They are in a league of their own.

  3. PSA: found a great little tutorial on proper way to mount Catek bindings.

    They are a bit tricky to mount but once you get it, it's easy (still time consuming, though).

    The outward cant I put on mine instantly made me a 200% better rider. Not that I recommend it for everyone but I definitely encourage everyone to make lots of adjustments to find a sweet spot of yours. It may be outside the box just as well!

    Now I ride (regular):

    Front: 0 deg; 6 deg toe lift, 3 deg cant to the left (outward)

    Back: 0 deg; 6 deg heel lift, 3 deg cant to the right (outward)

    Oh so comfy.

  4. From reading general carving community forum, the opinions suggest that the OS2 bindings exert substantial "lever" pressure to pull-out inserts or delaminate metal boards. What is the scoop with Catek OS2 bindings?

    I have OS2 mounted on MR173 and can't imagine this happen. If you use 3d elastomers or other isolation, of course. I wouldn't put them directly on any board, they are very hmm... hard core.

    BTW they are a revelation on a skwal - infinite adjustments make a huge difference! Plus a super - direct power transfer... actually this may be the best part.

  5. Your gonna get hit no matter what.

    I have more than enough titanium in my face to know that.

    Full-face helmet, full body armour (including hokey pants), super-awareness mode fully on.

    With regards to helmet mounted mirrors, I think you mean www.bugeyes.com, I find them allright for road use but useless on the slope. You need lots of field of view coverage while boarding, they don't provide that at all.

  6. Hi! I know what "narrow" means :) I'd go for 6 deg lifts front and rear with no canting. Plus set the rear boot's lean adjuster much more forward than the front one. Stand in front of the mirror barefoot in your stance and see how your rear ankle is much more inclined to see what I mean. I am risking getting flamed here but try no splay and a narrow stance... Give it a chance and you'll be sorted.

  7. OK, I hereby cross-post some of my Polish friends ideas. I find them usefull (well, to a point) :eplus2:

    Laughter aside, I think sticking some crazy (but harmless) things on the tails of our boards may just be enough to get the message through. Don't you think?

    shaman:

    getfile.php?id=3419&rid=20948&a=a

    getfile.php?id=3420&rid=20948&a=a

    qxqx: HPIM0762.jpg

  8. The only way to truly protect the board is to take it off, just like Hans said. I also clip in just before getting in the chair (NOT clip in) and I only wait for comments on that. :boxing_sm Haven't got in a fight yet but it will happen.

    As to sticking things onto my board I was thinking sandpaper, also a slalom cone (but it would problematic to make it stay on).

    I think the problem is that most of guys over here ride rented equipment and they don't give a sht.

  9. I don't see any advantage over ski boots.

    Well, it is more a problem than disadvantage, but ski boots' sole length is just inapropriate for most skwal bindings if your leg is big enough. I am right on the edge (28.5 mondo) with most bindings I tried.

    Anyway, I am so used to snowboarding with ACSS that I can't really tell if stiffening the boots would be beneficial for me. I like the way I can move front to back and absorb bumps using ankles. I guess I will have to try to remove the spring system and see if it feels any better (I can't really see how it could be more stable at speed - my SK200 is rock solid upto mach 3).

    Interesting food for thought. :biggthump

  10. What I was trying to say is that if you're looking for rigidity, the first thing to do is remove your snowboard boots from the equation, not blow the best part of 500 bucks on stiffer bindings.

    The "stepin" question for skwals is made more interesting by the fact that a good number of people ride with a ski boot up front and a snowboard boot in the rear.

    Is really stiffer - better?

×
×
  • Create New...