dano Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Old sims burner 162 w/ nice looking cateks sold on ebay for $421. Someone please tell me why..... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7211533510&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&rd=1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kamran Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 hmm...nice looking cateks ...say around 200$ for the bindings....that leaves 221$ for the board. I'd say 50 to 75$ above the 'value' for the board. not that outrageous.... but then again, who and what sets the real value? I scratch my head too when I see almost new madds sell on ebay for the low 300$. supply and demand? don't know.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snow|3oarder Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 money laundering? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tufty Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 L@@K!!! R@RE!!! G@ F@ST!!! I'd put it down to stupidity on the part of the buyer. It's possible that the last minute snipe by trenchdigger1096 was a shill bid intended to push everyone up to their maximum (being 116$ over the 'at the time' highest bid) before backing out and offering to the second highest bidder. eBay can be very full of wankers. Simon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kent Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 That vintage of Burner 162 was a total POS and only worthy of a VERY lightweight kids for a GS deck..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yard Sale Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 There's an O.Sin 4807 currently at $410. And it's only a 168, not 178. http://offer.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewBids&item=7212469686 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest timrides Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 That vintage of Burner 162 was a total POS and only worthy of a VERY lightweight kids for a GS deck..... Is there a better vintage of this deck? How can you tell? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Sub Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 Im thinkin people start getting desparate in the middle of the season I shoulda sold my stuff NOW instead o' THEN funniest part is...and y'all know its true...if you were the seller in any of these inflated auctions you'd be stoked, and likely not calling the bidders stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kent Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 Is there a better vintage of this deck? How can you tell? YMMV - but all the Burner 162 "suck"...minus the old (1998) white decks. The shapes were perfect, the bases were sweet...but the flex was all wrong. 167 and higher are a different story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.