First of all, I'm not dissing you, I'm dissing the magazine testers. But you did say, and I quote, "The magazine will have to publish their results, but I doubt many will be surprised to find that by the end of the five-day test the STs were left in the board rack. Pretty specialist tools, those." You were talking about them testing powder boards, and my take on your comment was that ST's are too specialized for general powder riding, perhaps not what you intended. Your last post mentioned BC cat riding, which to me conjures up an image of untracked powder, which IMHO is the perfect place for a ST. You mentioned pro riders, who have been known to huck cliffs and kickers in the BC, something I am not likely to do. Perhaps that makes an ST unappealing to them. Different strokes for different folks. You seem to agree with what your preception of their opinion is, what is your BC board of choice? I labored over the choice between the Prior ST and Khyber, and in the end I chose the ST. In a perfect world I'd have both.