Jump to content
Note to New Members ×

Thirst Snowboard.. Purchase experience Excellent!!!


Shred Gruumer

Recommended Posts

So I pulled the trigger pretty much sight unseen and never riden.. I'll give a great local guy a try any day!!  All I got to say is " Classy" and "professional". It's a one man show so the anticipation was driving me nuts as my season is done.. Well good fortune hit and it showed up Priorty Mail (standard with purchase) today... And it's snowing!! So off I go this weekend..!!  Everything about the purchase was great.. Down to the cool build sheet ya get!!  And the included baby blanket is sweet.. Just a really cool professional job.. Not to mention the board is bangin cherry 🍒!! So much cool detail.. I tried to pick it up in photos but like others have said photos don't do it justice..  I'm just taken back by the effort and attention to detail and really the little things that just give it that personal touch!!  

I know what I'm buying next!!  

Definitely worth the chance.. So glad I did!!! 

 

DSC_0674-1238x2201.JPG

DSC_0683-1238x2201.JPG

DSC_0678-1238x2201.JPG

DSC_0675-1238x2201.JPG

DSC_0670-2201x1238.JPG

DSC_0676-1238x2201.JPG

DSC_0684-1238x2201.JPG

DSC_0685-1238x2201.JPG

Edited by Shred Gruumer
  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Shred Gruumer said:

Mine closes this weekend!!! That was close.. But hey.. It's actually snowing of some significance!!! It's worth the wait!! 

Looking forward to see this compares too your Oxessessesxnkjfdry78he

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, what a bitchin looking board!!  Congrats!  Love where Mark is going with his top sheet designs.  Got to meet Mark and ride the Superconductor and the new X at MCC.  Took me some time to get use to his boards (I’m a front foot driver) but fell in love with them once I addapted my riding to them!  

Cant wait to work with him on a build this summer!  I think I’m gonna go with the thin pin-stripe lettering and snowflakes like yours,  but blue and “Superconductor” in blue along with blue sidewalls.  

Please give us a review if you make it out before the season ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's different for sure.. Its tough conditions today.. . Extreme granular packed frozen in the morning.. It was a a little louder than titanal.. But for what it was conditions wise (rock hard midmest shitski) the thirst road pretty ****ing good.. Then I had about an hour when it softened just enough and could tell the board really shined... Man it can turn... It does ride a bit better set back.. But I'm I'm up a bit than most do.. Hard to tell though as conditions  are really hard... I think it's definitely a keeper!!! 

Again for when the ice turned good.. It turned to life... I really liked it.. Has a better dinamic than my boring same turn Oxess... Has more variability to it.. Blown away on how tight it can turn.. Trick is to angulate and flip it over... As soon as I got my lazy as to commit to getting the board up I would say it road the best... I brought 4 of my best boards to compare and I road the thirst the most as it handled everything on average much better than my others.. I would say if your used to Oxess, coiler, virus... You will not be disappointed!!! It's that good if not at the top...  I don't have any investment in any of the companies... I just like good boards... And the Thirst.. Should be on your quiver list!!! 

Edited by Shred Gruumer
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DBcUtoo.jpg
Sold the one you like less.  quite a few people make it work that way.

I also get that $ don't grow on tree.  Don't think you can go wrong with neither.
Try to demo if possible.  What's your use case? race?  free/recreation carving?
Talk to the builder; that's beauty of our sport.  They are very accessable.
Tough decision/first world problem lol; best of luck and let us know how it goes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Comapedrosa said:

Still between the Superconductor and a Kessler Alpine 168 for my next addition. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.

Ouch...couldn't be more different.  The Kessler is Titanal and the Thirst is not...  that alone on feel is big..   The Kessler is wider so that will feel different.  Different sidecut geometry and set back.  Will this be your only board?  Yea he's right buy both!!! There different!! 

 

Edited by Shred Gruumer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shred Gruumer said:

Ouch...couldn't be more different.  The Kessler is Titanal and the Thirst is not...  that alone on feel is big..   The Kessler is wider so that will feel different.  Different sidecut geometry and set back.  Will this be your only board?  Yea he's right buy both!!! There different!! 

 

 

15 hours ago, Comapedrosa said:

Still between the Superconductor and a Kessler Alpine 168 for my next addition. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.

Thirst sidecut likes to complete turns, just keep it on edge and/or apply more pressure to turn tighter.  Kessler has a race-course derived variable sidecut radius, so adds fore and aft rider weight distribution to the turning equation; get back on the tail=less turning, nose pressure=tighter turn.   

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, bigwavedave said:

Kessler has a race-course derived variable sidecut radius, so adds fore and aft rider weight distribution to the turning equation; get back on the tail=less turning, nose pressure=tighter turn.   

I don’t believe that is how the KST works.  The 168 in particular is 12 under foot and steadily decreases to 8 as you work your way out to the tip and tail equally.  This, combined with some early rise in the tip and tail mean that the turn radius decreases the more you get it on edge (aggressively attack the turn).

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bigwavedave said:

Thirst sidecut likes to complete turns, just keep it on edge and/or apply more pressure to turn tighter.  Kessler has a race-course derived variable sidecut radius, so adds fore and aft rider weight distribution to the turning equation; get back on the tail=less turning, nose pressure=tighter turn.   

 

1 hour ago, workshop7 said:

I don’t believe that is how the KST works.  The 168 in particular is 12 under foot and steadily decreases to 8 as you work your way out to the tip and tail equally.  This, combined with some early rise in the tip and tail mean that the turn radius decreases the more you get it on edge (aggressively attack the turn).

Not sure if either of these are fully correct, actually. I could be incredibly wrong, though. Probably am, let's face it.

@bigwavedave The biggest radius is definitely between the bindings.

@workshop7 I measured up the waist and the 30cm between the bindings pretty was pretty much constant. I don't think you can steadily and equally decrease to 8 from this point because the point at which the radius is largest is set back from the middle of the board. It is definitely not linearly decreased from the middle radius to the tip/tail.

Speculation: It is possible it decreases at equivalent rates to the tip and tail but since the tip is further away it reaches its 8m designation, but at the tail it stopped short. Something like this. I would say the average is around 11-12m, when comparing it to other boards I've had.

Edited by daveo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, daveo said:

 

Not sure if either of these are fully correct, actually. I could be incredibly wrong, though. Probably am, let's face it.

@bigwavedave The biggest radius is definitely between the bindings.

@workshop7 I measured up the waist and the 30cm between the bindings pretty was pretty much constant. I don't think you can steadily and equally decrease to 8 from this point because the point at which the radius is largest is set back from the middle of the board. It is definitely not linearly decreased from the middle radius to the tip/tail.

Speculation: It is possible it decreases at equivalent rates to the tip and tail but since the tip is further away it reaches its 8m designation, but at the tail it stopped short. Something like this. I would say the average is around 11-12m, when comparing it to other boards I've had.

Ahh, I thought it was  a "clothoid" sidecut from tip to tail, like the other Kesslers I've had felt like. If I finished turns on the tail they seemed to open up; wt forward to keep turning. Only rode the 168 for a couple of runs.  It felt very similar to my Rev 175  with an 11-12m scr,  but since the 168 is 8-12m range I wouldn't expect it would feel any bigger than 12m,  even if I finished my turns back on the tail, which I often find myself doing naturally.

So the 168 doesn't turn tighter if you keep wt forward and tightens up a bit if you finish your turn back on the tail?

Sidecuts are a mystery to me when measuring or eyeing them up, I can't tell until I ride it. I have no idea what's going on with Thirst sidecuts, but they are different than anything I've ridden, and I kinda like it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@bigwavedave I dunno man, I'm probably completely wrong, but I think it is a clothoid where the middle portion (between the feet) is the largest portion of the scr, like a rollercoaster sorta thing. So when ridden middle it rides biggest, front rides smallest since it's longest and the clothoid has more time to tighten and the rear rides mediumest (...) since it's shorter than the nose.

That's just my feelings from my riding it. Keep in mind, I'm usually wrong.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@bigwavedave and @daveo

It is clothoid and is the same design philosophy as all the other K Alpines.  I have never taken the time to measure the board and do the math, I’m only going by the specs listed on the website for the 168 (8-12).  I do know that when I ride it I can get it to turn as tightly or more so than my MK which is, by most people’s account, a 9.  I can also get it to ride much bigger radius turns at higher speeds while still maintaining far more stability than my MK.  In those situations the 168 rides more like my Coiler 174 (10.5/12.7.12).  @Jack M any thoughts here?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, workshop7 said:

I do know that when I ride it I can get it to turn as tightly or more so than my MK which is, by most people’s account, a 9.  I can also get it to ride much bigger radius turns at higher speeds while still maintaining far more stability than my MK.  In those situations the 168 rides more like my Coiler 174 (10.5/12.7.12).

Agree with these sentiments above.

One thing I have noticed and it's not a drawback or weakness but probably just by design, if you want to crank tightish turns, it can get a bit stressed at higher speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, daveo said:

Agree with these sentiments above.

One thing I have noticed and it's not a drawback or weakness but probably just by design, if you want to crank tightish turns, it can get a bit stressed at higher speeds.

Yeah.  It is softer than the other K Alpines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, workshop7 said:

Yeah.  It is softer than the other K Alpines.

Definitely. I found the SG Full Carve about as soft, but had more confidence with higher speeds + tighter turns. But that's probably geometry related.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Comapedrosa said:

Still between the Superconductor and a Kessler Alpine 168 for my next addition.

Haven't seen or ridden the Thirst but I've got the K168 and the Thirst reviews  sound too much alike to me......same tool, different technique  -  The K168 is a Scalpel, the Thirst is.... a Steak Knife?...they both can cut!

I'm lusting after a Totally Different Ride from the K168 -  Thirst SF162  🤩

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, workshop7 said:

@bigwavedave and @daveo

It is clothoid and is the same design philosophy as all the other K Alpines.  I have never taken the time to measure the board and do the math, I’m only going by the specs listed on the website for the 168 (8-12).  I do know that when I ride it I can get it to turn as tightly or more so than my MK which is, by most people’s account, a 9.  I can also get it to ride much bigger radius turns at higher speeds while still maintaining far more stability than my MK.  In those situations the 168 rides more like my Coiler 174 (10.5/12.7.12).  @Jack M any thoughts here?

I measured my K168.  Indeed the radius is longest around the waist.  In fact, there is about a 10cm span around the waist where the width of the board is a constant 202mm.  So the radius goes much longer (infinitely longer) than 12m in the center of the board.  The published 8-12 is merely an approximated representation.  All that said, 8-12m feels about right, and your statements above are consistent with my experience.  It is simply the most unique and effective sidecut I've ever tried.

4 hours ago, Erik J said:

Welp, looks like I'm selling some stuff to make room for a Thirst now. 

Try a K168 and an MK first.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...